- Oct 26, 2006
According to Reggie Middleton the assets of AIB bank are being counted by both AIB and the ECB. This is wrong for obvious reasons and AIB has in turn been borrowing against these 'assets'. Middleton suspects depositors at AIB could get a haircut on par with Cyprus as a result.
[h=2]Are You About To Get Cyprus'd in Ireland? When A Single Word's Worth Billions Of Euros..[/h]
Are You About To Get Cyprus'd in Ireland? When A Single Word's Worth Billions Of Euros...AIB has inccurred significant debt from which the underlying collateral has significantly diminished. This caused the need for even more capital and more borrowing. It also apparently caused it to change the wording in its annual statements regarding repos, potentially allowing it to conceal financial aid in the form of even more debt .from another party. After all, when you borrow something it's a loan right, as in additional debt??? Below, you see a loophole for near unimited borrowing, and not a peep will show up in the financial reporting!
It appears that AIB is stating that they have given certain segregated securities as security to the ECB whereas the ECB actually decides which securities will be designated as eligible. The charge is in favor of the Central Bank and is over all present and future liabilities whatsoever of AIB. This charge is a floating charge over repo agreements, aka Eligible Securities - securities that the graphic above demonstrates can go on ad nauseum and way beyond the entities prudent ability to repay, yet not appear on the balance sheet or in its regulatory reporting!!!. These securities have been purchased by the ECB through the repo agreements.
Thus, it appears as if this floating charge granted to the ECB is over assets that the ECB already owned. The floating charge was given to the ECB by AIB for emergency funding (emergency liquidity). Do you see a circular argument here? A potential Ponzi even???!!!! I warned my paying subscribers three years ago, Beware of the Potential Irish Ponzi Scheme!