• Due to a glitch in the old vBulletin software, some users were "banned" when they tried to change their passwords at the end of February. This does not apply after the site was converted to Xenforo. If you were affected by this, please us viua the Contact us link in the footer.

Adams and SF Leadership, Not Thatcher, Culpable For Last Six Hunger Strike Deaths’


johnny365

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 21, 2007
Messages
14,305
As I watched yesterday evenings news I was dismayed at how cynical Gerry Adams was in his remarks on Mrs Thatcher death. His remarks seemed to blame Thatcher policy as leading to the deaths of the hunger strikers. This is SF/IRA revisionism at its worst, Thatcher handled the strikes very badly but surely to blame her for the outcome is cynical in the extreme. It seems that SF/IRA want everybody to blame Thatcher and not examine the role the “Republican” leadership played in the hunger strikes.

In recent years claims have been made that Adams, Martin McGuinness and other Sinn Féin figures hide a document containing a British offer to end the strike from the hunger strikers. But it was uncovered through a Freedom of Information request. Richard O'Rawe, the former public relations officer for the H-block hunger strikers, also claimed
Two sources at IRA Army Council level told him that Adams had never even informed the Army Council of the British offer.


It was clear to any objectively minded observers that the SF/IRA leadership were gaining politically from the hunger strikes and wanted to prolong the strikes. Gerry Adams also rejected suggestions in the media that the British had made a compromise offer that was accepted by some in the Republican movement, but rejected by the Provisional IRA leadership as it was gaining politically from the hunger strikes.

Evidence which has now become available that terms for ending the strike, accepted by the prisoners' leadership in the Maze/Long Kesh, were rejected by IRA commanders outside. The implication is that the lives of six of the hunger strikers might have been saved if the prisoners hadn't been overruled.Adams also denied that Sands made any offer to end the hunger strike despite the offer being released in state papers.

So are Adams and the “Republican” leadership responsible for the hunger strikers deaths and not Maggie Thatcher? Will SF/IRA ever come clean about how they handled the hunger strikers ? Were Sands and co used in a cynical way to further the careers of Republican leaders? We have seen this in recent years when some members of the Republican movement were called traitors to Ireland when they did not conform to the wishes of Adams and McGuinness? Were Sands and co expendable to the Adams and McGuniness leadership and advancement of political careers in the “Republican” leadership?


Gerry Adams questions Bobby Sands hunger strike claim · TheJournal.ie


Will IRA ever admit truth over hunger strike? - BelfastTelegraph.co.uk
 
Last edited:


Hitch 22

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 26, 2011
Messages
5,220
Adams et al were in a power struggle with hardliners since the early and mid 1970s. The hardliners were the instigators of the split from the OIRA and they later broke away and formed the CIRA, RIRA etc.

The ballot box/Armalite strategy probably could only gain ground when enough martyrs had died.

The different republican traditions always needs martyrs as a foundation:

The 1916 leaders are claimed by the broader nationalist gene pool.

Collins is FG property.

The executed 77 are FF property.

The 14 killed by the paras are the property of all Troubles era republican paramilitaries.

The 10 dead hunger strikes - a nice round number - are the martyrs that fit into the mythology of post GFA SF.

If there were only four dead hunger strikers chances are they might have been a historical foot note.

Adams needed 10 dead to make a bigger splash.
 

DuineEile

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 29, 2010
Messages
14,939
Loon 1 and Loon 2 talk amongst themselves.

Plus ça change.



D
 

neiphin

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 23, 2009
Messages
5,585
Loon 1 and Loon 2 talk amongst themselves.

Plus ça change.



D
a trolling tread , best ignored
why its not in the zoo already i cannot understand
 

borntorum

Well-known member
Joined
May 26, 2008
Messages
12,805
Labour supporter defends Thatcher. The Stickies would be proud.
 

johnny365

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 21, 2007
Messages
14,305
Labour supporter defends Thatcher. The Stickies would be proud.
I was critical of Thatcher in the OP. i am merely seeking to examine the role of the "Republican" leadership in the hunger strikes. It is too easy just to blame Thatcher.
 

Ren84

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 14, 2011
Messages
49,992
Does it ever get boring ya pair of gobshytes? Seriously seek help for your obsession with Adams and the Shinners.
 

Kev408

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 26, 2006
Messages
5,123
Ah I wouldn't mind johnny365/spoofer. Any time a Brit icon turns out to be corrupt, a perjurer, a paedophile or just a plain c*nt Johnny/spoofer starts an entertaining, bullshyt-ridden thread designed to deflect from it. He's simple and although he can be embarrassing for whatever anti-Irish cause he thinks he's promoting, the entertainment value is good. Like the insane Covenanter and excelt/liar posters.
 

johnny365

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 21, 2007
Messages
14,305
Does it ever get boring ya pair of gobshytes? Seriously seek help for your obsession with Adams and the Shinners.
Why dont you try responding to the OP and the role the "Republican" leadership played in the hunger strikes?
 

DuineEile

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 29, 2010
Messages
14,939
Does it ever get boring ya pair of gobshytes? Seriously seek help for your obsession with Adams and the Shinners.
'Fraid not. Johnny365 is a Johnny all year round.


D
 

johnny365

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 21, 2007
Messages
14,305
Ah I wouldn't mind johnny365/spoofer. Any time a Brit icon turns out to be corrupt, a perjurer, a paedophile or just a plain c*nt Johnny/spoofer starts an entertaining, bullshyt-ridden thread designed to deflect from it. He's simple and although he can be embarrassing for whatever anti-Irish cause he thinks he's promoting, the entertainment value is good. Like the insane Covenanter and excelt/liar posters.
Why dont you just try commenting on the OP rather than firing insults.
 

Northtipp

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 23, 2010
Messages
22,217
I like this one

@TomSelleckCSC: Just got the DeLorean out the garage, going back to 1987 to tell The Jungle, Thatcher and Rangers are deid.
 

New Threads

Popular Threads

Most Replies

Top