• Due to a glitch in the old vBulletin software, some users were "banned" when they tried to change their passwords at the end of February. This does not apply after the site was converted to Xenforo. If you were affected by this, please contact us.



Blacklisting of conservatives?



Wagmore

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 17, 2015
Messages
12,416
What is wrong with all the pro-Zuckerberg people here?
Is it not obvious that there is zero objectivity in Facebook's enforcement of its terms of service?
Is it not obvious that FB has no respect for freedom of speech?
Is it not obvious that Zuckerberg is a disgusting creep?
Is it not obvious that all this censorship and blacklisting is being carried out by a bunch of nerds in Silicon Valley who are answerable to no one?

Of course it's not just Facebook. It's also Google, Youtube, Instagram, Amazon, Patreon, etc. etc. All controlled by the same nerds who know little to nothing about human reality, human history, human rights, or civil rights.

Two more simple questions for the pro-Zucks: Why are people like WeAreChange banned? What is dangerous about them?
Beggars belief. Have come to have zero respect for those who would have us believe there's nothing malign about what these Big Tech creeps like Zuckerborg are trying to pull.
 

Wagmore

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 17, 2015
Messages
12,416
At last--Sure Rainmaker will tell us they don't have a case to answer
 

Wagmore

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 17, 2015
Messages
12,416
It all comes down to you may see it as discriminatory and unfair, but the people they have removed have said and continue to say hateful things, also again they have the legal right to decide who & what they allow on their site, you may not like it but tough!!
This is going to be such a fun thread flicking back over what was said before the Feds got their Anti-Trust act together. Still think it's "tough."
 

Wagmore

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 17, 2015
Messages
12,416
No, this has been explained to you. You do not have a right of absolute freedom of speech on someone elses platform. They get to decide what is acceptable on their servers.

As for immunity from prosecution, that is not what they are worried about. What they are worried about is losing users and advertisers and therefore their revenue streams.
Oh look here's Rainmaker---Feds don't seem to agree with you Rainmaker. Don't seem to agree with you at all. Big Tech is scared......how about you? Listen to the patronising tone---"this has been explained to you." Think something important is about to be explained to you. Stay tuned y'all
 
Last edited:

rainmaker

Administrator
Joined
Mar 26, 2012
Messages
22,466
Oh look here's Rainmaker---Feds don't seem to agree with you Rainmaker. Don't seem to agree with you at all. Big Tech is scared......how about you?
That's not what any potential investigation would be about. It would about business practices. If it ever happens at all.

Not about Alex Jones being allowed to incite intimidation of the parents of murdered five year olds - and you're almost vile as he is for your support.

Why do you have such enormous comprehension difficulties - it's like trying to discuss something with a less than bright nine year old.
 

Wagmore

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 17, 2015
Messages
12,416
That's not what any potential investigation would be about. It would about business practices. If it ever happens at all.

Not about Alex Jones being allowed to incite intimidation of the parents of murdered five year olds

Why do you have such enormous comprehension difficulties - it's like trying to discuss something with a less than bright nine year old.
Ha Ha---we'll see. Reckon I'll be posting this one too in a little bit. This has everything to do about freedom of speech. You just haven't realised it yet. Comprehension difficulties---so funny
 

rainmaker

Administrator
Joined
Mar 26, 2012
Messages
22,466
Ha Ha---we'll see. Reckon I'll be posting this one too in a little bit. This has everything todo with free speech
No, it doesn't. There has been a thread on this for days. Look it up. 'Anti trust' refers to unfair business practices, not free speech.

Stop making yourself look like an utter cretin for once and try doing some research on some credible sites instead of far right loon blogs.

I am in no mood for breaking out crayons to explain everything to you like a child.
 

Wagmore

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 17, 2015
Messages
12,416
No, it doesn't. There has been a thread on this for days. Look it up. 'Anti trust' refers to unfair business practices, not free speech.

Stop making yourself look like an utter cretin for once and try doing some research on some credible sites instead of far right loon blogs.

I am in no mood for breaking out crayons to explain everything to you like a child.
When you're being demonetized that is an "unfair business practise." But we'll see. Stay tuned and hang on to those crayons.
 

rainmaker

Administrator
Joined
Mar 26, 2012
Messages
22,466
When you're being demonetized that is an "unfair business practise." But we'll see. Stay tuned and hang on to those crayons.
It is about business practices, nothing to with the likes of Jones being booted for abusing the memory of murdered infant children.
 

Wagmore

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 17, 2015
Messages
12,416
That's not what any potential investigation would be about. It would about business practices. If it ever happens at all.

Not about Alex Jones being allowed to incite intimidation of the parents of murdered five year olds - and you're almost vile as he is for your support.

Why do you have such enormous comprehension difficulties - it's like trying to discuss something with a less than bright nine year old.
Oh oh---less than 24hrs and Rainmaker' s argument is already Swiss Cheesed. Article mentions problems surrounding "ideological bias." It's like trying to discuss something with a less than bright nine yr old. Indeed. Have you any spare crayons, might help explain some very badic stuff to you.
 

Paddyc

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 30, 2009
Messages
9,523

AyaanMyHero

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 25, 2017
Messages
780

Another one bites the dust. PressForTruth YouTube channel demonitised.
 

soubresauts

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 2, 2007
Messages
3,157

Another one bites the dust. PressForTruth YouTube channel demonitised.
Yes, it's appalling. Anyone with half a brain can see that PressForTruth has not violated YouTube's terms and conditions. But if those nerds in Silicon Valley decide they don't like you, you're out of the game.
 

AyaanMyHero

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 25, 2017
Messages
780
Yes, it's appalling. Anyone with half a brain can see that PressForTruth has not violated YouTube's terms and conditions. But if those nerds in Silicon Valley decide they don't like you, you're out of the game.
PFT seem to be model citizens in actual fact. Hope it is a mistake that can be rectified.
 


New Threads

Popular Threads

Most Replies

Top