- Mar 19, 2018
You are setting the bar remarkably low there.Soldier F would only have to prove that he reasonably believed that there were armed terrorists in his sight. The onus on the prosecution is to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
In England there have been several cases where armed policemen wrongly but reasonably believed that their lives were under threat when they opened fire and were thus acquitted.
His perjury and repeated lies will be very hard to wish away