• It has come to our attention that some users may have been "banned" when they tried to change their passwords after the site was hacked due to a glitch in the old vBulletin software. This would have occurred around the end of February and does not apply after the site was converted to Xenforo. If you believe you were affected by this, please contact a staff member or use the Contact us link at the bottom of any forum page.

Could adapted rules in rings and darts teach arithmetic better than computer games?


patslatt

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 11, 2007
Messages
13,693
Ring boards were around in my childhood in local pubs and some households,a traditional Irish game that has almost disappeared. It is a safer game for children to play than darts which pierce. Both rings and darts are fun and the latter accompanied by copious alcohol to steady the nerves of the throwing hand can be addictive!

Adaptation of rules in these games could give practice in multiplication and division for children as well as in addition and subtraction.For example,odd numbers could trigger a multiplication of the last score on the scoreboard and even numbers a division of it.Scores could become very large so some rules on limits would be needed.Maybe the winner would be first to meet a target number by avoiding undershooting or overshooting it.

Wouldn't this be more fun and more sociable for children than learning arithmetic from computer games?
 
Last edited:

Cellach

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 8, 2009
Messages
5,094
Ring boards were around in my childhood in local pubs and some households,a traditional Irish game that has almost disappeared. It is a safer game for children to play than darts which pierce. Both rings and darts are fun and the latter accompanied by copious alcohol to steady the nerves of the throwing hand can be addictive!

Adaptation of rules in these games could give practice in multiplication and division for children as well as in addition and subtraction.For example,odd numbers could trigger a multiplication of the last score on the scoreboard and even numbers a division of it.Scores could become very large so some rules on limits would be needed.

Wouldn't this be more fun and more sociable for children than learning arithmetic from computer games?
Do children learn arithmetic from computer games?
 
Joined
Oct 8, 2011
Messages
40,632
It could help them count down from 501.

[video=youtube;sHnBppccI0o]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sHnBppccI0o[/video]
 

Cellach

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 8, 2009
Messages
5,094
Education progressives encourage computer games as a means of learning.
Ah okay. If I may offer a mild criticism that wasn't quite clear from the OP. I assume that they don't encourage computer games as a substitute for actual teaching?
I see nothing wrong in theory with your 'Rings' idea. At what kind of a level would the decision to select computer games or traditional games as a method of supplementing learning be made?
 
Joined
Oct 8, 2011
Messages
40,632
You get a good idea of someone's mental faculties when you watch them go for a 126 finish with three darts in hand.
 

patslatt

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 11, 2007
Messages
13,693
Ah okay. If I may offer a mild criticism that wasn't quite clear from the OP. I assume that they don't encourage computer games as a substitute for actual teaching?
I see nothing wrong in theory with your 'Rings' idea. At what kind of a level would the decision to select computer games or traditional games as a method of supplementing learning be made?
As soon as kids can throw a ring with reasonable accuracy. I'd guess age 5. As for computer games,immediately in conjunction with teaching.
 

Tin Foil Hat

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 3, 2010
Messages
2,900
Ring boards were around in my childhood in local pubs and some households,a traditional Irish game that has almost disappeared. It is a safer game for children to play than darts which pierce. Both rings and darts are fun and the latter accompanied by copious alcohol to steady the nerves of the throwing hand can be addictive!

Adaptation of rules in these games could give practice in multiplication and division for children as well as in addition and subtraction.For example,odd numbers could trigger a multiplication of the last score on the scoreboard and even numbers a division of it.Scores could become very large so some rules on limits would be needed.Maybe the winner would be first to meet a target number by avoiding undershooting or overshooting it.

Wouldn't this be more fun and more sociable for children than learning arithmetic from computer games?

I've a better idea. Teach kids their tables like they used to and ban calculators from primary schools and from secondary schools until senior cycle. It isn't fukking rocket surgery.
 

Cellach

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 8, 2009
Messages
5,094
As soon as kids can throw a ring with reasonable accuracy. I'd guess age 5. As for computer games,immediately in conjunction with teaching.
Apologies, I meant at what level would the decision be made to implement such a scheme? Teacher, principal, department?
 

patslatt

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 11, 2007
Messages
13,693
Apologies, I meant at what level would the decision be made to implement such a scheme? Teacher, principal, department?
As a leisure activity,it could be introduced by any teacher in the same hours as sporting activities.
 

patslatt

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 11, 2007
Messages
13,693
I've a better idea. Teach kids their tables like they used to and ban calculators from primary schools and from secondary schools until senior cycle. It isn't fukking rocket surgery.
Rings would incentivise kids to learn times tables to compete in rings with rules adapted for multiplication and division.Suppose a kid threw three rings and landed on numbers 2 and 4,designated as +2 and -4. That would be a net score of -2.This could require division by -2 of his/her score on the scoreboard,say 20, but if the scoreboard score is triple digit at say 130, the division could be limited to the first two digits. So division of 20 results in -10 and division of 13 results in -6.5,rounded to -7. These figures would be subtracted from the scoreboard to arrive at a new score of 10 or 13. Minus figures could be all even numbers or all odd numbers,or numbers coloured to be minus.
 
Last edited:
Top