• Due to a glitch in the old vBulletin software, some users were "banned" when they tried to change their passwords at the end of February. This does not apply after the site was converted to Xenforo. If you were affected by this, please us viua the Contact us link in the footer.

Explains a lot : When people are in doubt, they defend their views even more fiercely




paulp

Well-known member
Joined
May 5, 2007
Messages
7,284
When in Doubt, Shout! ? Psychological Science


I often see this in politics - does anyone have practical suggestions on how to deal with "die hards" ?

cYp
move them an inch at a time

step 1
"I agree Fianna Fail have done great things for this country and it's a pitty they didn't have slightly better financial regulator in place - but compared to the opposition ......"

.
.
.
step 25
"We should hang the lot of them for treason"
 

Fides

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 6, 2010
Messages
4,441
Having been in retail for 20 years the more a customer is in the wrong (i.e they did something stupid themselves) the louder they shouted the odds. In fact an overly aggressive customer always makes me suspicious. Not a great deal you can do about it though.
 

Garland Names the Skies

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 7, 2010
Messages
4,656
Or you could bribe your way to admin status and then get rid of people who might be better than you so you can shine?
 

Victor Meldrew

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 8, 2007
Messages
7,172
When in Doubt, Shout! ? Psychological Science

I often see this in politics - does anyone have practical suggestions on how to deal with "die hards" ?

cYp
The emperor's new clothes is also relevant here. It's also why objectivity is so rare in all Irish walks of life. It's inherent in any "anti-intellectual" culture.

I try to be disinterested (look it up) in decision making processes where I want the best outcome but am open as to what that is. Maybe it's a light ego , maybe it's a scientific background, but all I know is that sometimes it's misinterptrted as being "weak or indecisive.

It explains a lot here..
 

Akrasia

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 6, 2006
Messages
1,128
When in Doubt, Shout! ? Psychological Science


I often see this in politics - does anyone have practical suggestions on how to deal with "die hards" ?

cYp
Interesting study.

It appears that the true believers feel safer in numbers, and they're often finding validation in their beliefs, not in the content of their beliefs or the evidence or the merits of what they believe in, but in re-assurance from others that their beliefs are reasonable.

One would think that this would lead them to switch to the more popular belief system, but this would be to admit failure, that the beliefs they previously had were wrong or that someone else was able to have unrequested influence over them, instead the strategy is to try and convince others to switch to their side.


There are a lot of psychological barriers out there where the true believers can be very difficult to reason with. One particularly frustrating element is that the human brain appears to be good at remembering statements, but very poor at remembering value judgements.
ie, whether the statement was true or false

Eg, If you read "Politician cleared of corruption charges" your brain will only remember the politician and corruption charges bits, and will be unsure what the link is. If you're already pre-disposed to dislike that particular politician, you'll remember the story as "politician charged with corruption".

If you have an entrenched position, you can be presented with some extremely powerful evidence that shows your position is flawed, but you will subconsciously filter a lot of that information out and only select those bits of information that you think supports your own position.

As far as practical strategies for dealing with people like this, I suppose, teaching people critical thinking skills through engaging with them and pointing out the logical fallacies that they are engaging in is a start.

Pointing out that all the genuinely skeptical organisations and experts in the field all tend to have reached a different conclusion to them, and they are left with siding with professional PR companies, vested interests and quacks for political academic and scientific support.

Then pointing out that claiming that all the skeptics are all part of the conspiracy is not a very convincing argument....
 

New Threads

Popular Threads

Most Replies

Top