• It has come to our attention that some users may have been "banned" when they tried to change their passwords after the site was hacked due to a glitch in the old vBulletin software. This would have occurred around the end of February and does not apply after the site was converted to Xenforo. If you believe you were affected by this, please contact a staff member or use the Contact us link at the bottom of any forum page.

FG-Labour split on Justice optout?


FutureTaoiseach

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 20, 2005
Messages
7,992
Website
greatdearleader.blogspot.com
In the Euro election manifesto, FG promised the abolition of Protocol 21 (the right to optout-in to EU Justice and Home Affairs policy on a case-by-case basis). Lucinda Creighton said on her blog at the time that it was 'too important to optout of'. Given my grave concerns about the consequences for Irish sovereignty of surrendering Protocol 21, I emailed Cllr Dermot Lacey to clarify the Labour position on this question and this was his reply:
Dermot Lacey said:
At the time of the adoption of the Lisbon
Treaty the Labour party accepted the Government support for the
retention of the Protocol on Justice and Home Affairs - we still do.
Given the nature of Justice issues and the need sometimes for cross
border co-operation on some criminal issues we agree with the notion of
looking at all these proposals on a case by case basis but the decision
on these to remain with the National Governments.
So what will happen to Protocol 21 under a FG-Labour govt? Will the FG policy of abandoning Protocol 21 win out, or the Labour position of retaining it?
 

Red_93

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 20, 2010
Messages
4,678
Uh, not another inane thread about Europe/immigration/asylum/Israel or the usual from you. FT, why did you e-mail a lower ranking labour rep (sorry Dermot) who doesn't even represent you? The logical thing would have been to email Michael D Hggins (FA spokesman) or Pat Rabitte (Justice spokesman) or Brendan Howlin (EU spokesman).
 
Top