• It has come to our attention that some users may have been "banned" when they tried to change their passwords after the site was hacked due to a glitch in the old vBulletin software. This would have occurred around the end of February and does not apply after the site was converted to Xenforo. If you believe you were affected by this, please contact a staff member or use the Contact us link at the bottom of any forum page.

India is 'losing Maoist battle' says Indian Prime Minister.


Cael

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 19, 2006
Messages
13,343
India's Prime Minister Manmohan Singh says his country is losing the battle against Maoist rebels.Mr Singh told a meeting of police chiefs from different states that rebel violence was increasing and the Maoists' appeal was growing.

The rebels say they are fighting for the rights of the poor. They operate in a large swathe of territory across central India, and in some areas have almost replaced the local government.

More than 6,000 people have been killed during their 20-year fight for a communist state.

"I have consistently held that in many ways, left-wing extremism poses perhaps the gravest internal security threat our country faces," Mr Singh told a conference of Indian police chiefs in the capital, Delhi. "We have discussed this in the last five years and I would like to state frankly that we have not achieved as much success as we would have liked in containing this menace."

The prime minister said that despite the government's best efforts, violence in Maoist-affected areas was going up. The prime minister admitted that the Maoists had growing appeal among a large section of Indian society, including tribal communities, the rural poor as well as sections of the intelligentsia and the youth.

Mr Singh said a more sensitive approach was necessary in dealing with the Maoists. "Dealing with left-wing extremism requires a nuanced strategy - a holistic approach. It cannot be treated simply as a law and order problem."

The rebels operate in 182 districts in India, mainly in the states of Jharkhand, Bihar, Andhra Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra and West Bengal. In some areas they have virtually replaced the local government and are able to mount spectacular attacks on government installations.

Indias's Simmering Revolution: India is 'losing Maoist battle' says Indian Prime Minister
 

deiseguy

Well-known member
Joined
May 11, 2009
Messages
1,346
According to an article I read in the last few days this is a cover story by the indian govt to force people off farmland which has been promised to a number of large indian and multinational corporations under a number of different types of deals. According to the articles the govt uses Maoist as a description for these groups because the hatred many Indians bear towards anyone Maoist gives the govt great freedom of action as they move against these people. I don't know how much credence to give the article but similar tactics are in use wherever there are clashes over natural resources between local groups and govt or multinationals
 
Joined
Nov 12, 2009
Messages
58
I would agree that India needs to modernise and to do so in a short space of time. We all know what happens when Maoism takes hold of a nation and if India doesnt do so soon, the horror of Maoism will be upon it and it can kiss goodbye to the great technological and cultural advances it has made in recent years for a slip back into a medievel form of Government that makes Islam look positively enlightened.
 

Rocky

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 9, 2004
Messages
8,550
I would agree that India needs to modernise and to do so in a short space of time. We all know what happens when Maoism takes hold of a nation and if India doesnt do so soon, the horror of Maoism will be upon it and it can kiss goodbye to the great technological and cultural advances it has made in recent years for a slip back into a medievel form of Government that makes Islam look positively enlightened.
They call also kiss their democracy goodbye.

It is worrying and it would be a nightmare if the world's largest democracy and one of the few non-Christian ones fell to a totalitarian dictatorship.
 

Aristodemus

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 8, 2009
Messages
3,741
There will be plenty of people on here who will be glad to hear that
 

bananarepublic.ie

Active member
Joined
Feb 15, 2009
Messages
237
According to an article I read in the last few days this is a cover story by the indian govt to force people off farmland which has been promised to a number of large indian and multinational corporations under a number of different types of deals. According to the articles the govt uses Maoist as a description for these groups because the hatred many Indians bear towards anyone Maoist gives the govt great freedom of action as they move against these people. I don't know how much credence to give the article but similar tactics are in use wherever there are clashes over natural resources between local groups and govt or multinationals
Where did you get this hillourious allegation, worst then Sun and Fox News. Having said that It is an ongoing issue, for the past 30 yrs, hand full of states are effected in India.

Naxalite - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

1) It is complete failure of sucessive govts in those states and partially sympathitic especially west bengal govt. On top land reforms and distribution is utter failure because of feudalistic society in those states.

2) Arms support and resources comes from Pakistan/China. It is China's silent revenge on India for giving shelter for his holiness Dalai Lama.

3) In 1980 there is a big support from middle class well educated students but later on it lost its cause when started blowing up police stations.

4) Central govt. can't stand at the same time military/air force dont want use its brutal force because of human rights voilation. State govt. cant take maoists because of lack of equipment Indian military might have supersonic cruise missles Su-30 MKI fighter jets but Indian Police have World War 2 equipment. Where as Naxals have moderate sophisticatin from Chinese arms supply.

5) Unless land reforms and rural development moderanisation problem remains.
 

Catalpa

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 10, 2004
Messages
10,301
Where did you get this hillourious allegation, worst then Sun and Fox News. Having said that It is an ongoing issue, for the past 30 yrs, hand full of states are effected in India.

Naxalite - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

1) It is complete failure of sucessive govts in those states and partially sympathitic especially west bengal govt. On top land reforms and distribution is utter failure because of feudalistic society in those states.

2) Arms support and resources comes from Pakistan/China. It is China's silent revenge on India for giving shelter for his holiness Dalai Lama.

3) In 1980 there is a big support from middle class well educated students but later on it lost its cause when started blowing up police stations.

4) Central govt. can't stand at the same time military/air force dont want use its brutal force because of human rights voilation. State govt. cant take maoists because of lack of equipment Indian military might have supersonic cruise missles Su-30 MKI fighter jets but Indian Police have World War 2 equipment. Where as Naxals have moderate sophisticatin from Chinese arms supply.

5) Unless land reforms and rural development moderanisation problem remains.
Unless land reforms and rural development moderanisation problem remains.


That's the nub of the issue. The 'Maoists' are localized and I would say there are many different groups and factions under this umbrella term.
 

bananarepublic.ie

Active member
Joined
Feb 15, 2009
Messages
237
Unless land reforms and rural development moderanisation problem remains.


That's the nub of the issue. The 'Maoists' are localized and I would say there are many different groups and factions under this umbrella term.
Yep i agree, its 1 bn ppl its hard to satisfy every group needs. Those "maoists" will not go with any kind of force at the same they will not achieve any thing from the govt. or for the ppl.
 

jcdf

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 8, 2005
Messages
3,778
You must be happy Cael. The possibility of a communist takeover of India. According to other posters this has been going on decades so we are unlikely to see red flags flying over India soon.

It is interesting the way the Indian government calls them Maoists. Is that what the groups call themselves?
I thought the Indian Government wanted to improve relations with China. Fighting battles with groups named after the founder of the current Chinese state could be taken as an insult by China.

Is there foreign aide going to these Maoists?
 

bananarepublic.ie

Active member
Joined
Feb 15, 2009
Messages
237
You must be happy Cael. The possibility of a communist takeover of India. According to other posters this has been going on decades so we are unlikely to see red flags flying over India soon.
Yes, there will be no red flag. Dont get confused with Maoist and other communist political parties. But Communist Party of India another communist party branch have significant control in the unions. Take example West bengal state and Kerala for the past 3 decades ppl elected comunist led govts. CPI is used to be coalation in congress led coalation in central govt. last time around. Not sure now they, i think Congress party got full majority.

It is interesting the way the Indian government calls them Maoists. Is that what the groups call themselves?
Yes. Maoist/Naxalites is the official names. Because they influenced from Mao's little red book.

I thought the Indian Government wanted to improve relations with China. Fighting battles with groups named after the founder of the current Chinese state could be taken as an insult by China.
There was no Love between India and China. There will not be. They have border disputes here and there. China supports pakistan which ultimately pisses of India. In return India recongized Taiwan long long time back, his holiness Dalai Lama lives in India , Arunachal pradesh a north westren state and Sikkim joined Indian union then China. So these flash points between India and china will not resolved over night. Both sides maturity then ego. But having said they business between india and china is 20 bn +.


Is there foreign aide going to these Maoists?
Of cource there foreign funding, India shows finger at China and pakistan. China denies so does Pakistan.
 

Clanrickard

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 25, 2008
Messages
33,026

O Luain

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 9, 2010
Messages
891
Christy can always be relied on to jump on any "right on" bandwagon.
Yes, like he does when he sings about Frank Ryan fighting Franco in the 30s.

Is that bandwagon still going :roll:
 

Clanrickard

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 25, 2008
Messages
33,026
Yes, like he does when he sings about Frank Ryan fighting Franco in the 30s.

Is that bandwagon still going :roll:
Must be if Chrsity is singing it.
 

O Luain

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 9, 2010
Messages
891
Will we get our call centers back if the revolution happens?
Are there any in those regions of India?

Even if there were we won't get "our" call centres back, no. They will simply move to the next cheapest labour market, Vietnam perhaps, or elsehwhere in India. Why would companies be so stupid as to move to a wealthy country where they have to pay more to the workers than the peanuts they pay those in the 3rd World? ?
 
Top