You're wasting your breath. Too many have a kind of selective bias where Muslims can do no wrong and Jews can do no right. Madness that so many sheep to the slaughter want to defend Islam, the most intolerant blood thirsty ideology on the planet.You see you can never win with you guys.
When an organisation is set up to try and present Israel's case, it can then be outright dismissed as just "Zionist propaganda", or "hasbara".
Very convenient. It means you only have to listen to one side of the argument, with no defence brooked.
And the only time I ever cited Breitbart was when Caroline Glick wrote in it. Because Glick has a highly coherent case to make, and is well capable of making it.
While leftist antisemites on this forum go around shrilly asserting that Israelis have zero rights to Judea and Samaria, well, most Israelis make no apologies for making claim to those rights, and Glick articulates that case well.
And I believe she should be heard in an environment where fat little Irish men with significant personal problems are running around shouting "no, no, they have zero rights".
You then bring up "Breaking the Silence", a nearly 15 year old propaganda initiative, stating that since it is from a "trusted source" (the Guardian) that that therefore forms the "honesty and reality" of this conflict, that it is therefore "not propaganda" etc.
To you this initiative is "...honesty and reality from a trusted news source , not one of your propaganda sites..."
But, - was it not demonstrated beyond all doubt that a large part of the funding of the spuriously named 'breaking the silence' initiative was made dependent on their gathering a minimum number of incriminating testimonies against the Israeli army before it could even be drawn down?
Yes, it was. Prove me wrong.
- Were the problems with the anonymous and unverifiable hearsay testimonies of this initiative not highlighted?
- Were the initiative's funders not shown up as having spurious motives, obvious antipathy towards Israel, and clear ulterior political agendas?
- Was it not demonstrated that this initiative was certainly not intended for a domestic Israeli audience. (Which basically told us all we need to know about the real intent of this initiative?)
You see, you're not even aware of the case the Israelis made in their defense regarding "Breaking the Silence". Because you dismissed it all as "Hasbara, Zionist, Propaganda...". You never even heard it.
As you never, ever fail to do. Because you just deep down need the Israeli Jews to be irredeemable monsters, in your reality, don't you.