• It has come to our attention that some users may have been "banned" when they tried to change their passwords after the site was hacked due to a glitch in the old vBulletin software. This would have occurred around the end of February and does not apply after the site was converted to Xenforo. If you believe you were affected by this, please contact a staff member or use the Contact us link at the bottom of any forum page.

Is the New Children's Hospital Mary harney's 'Bertie Bowl'?


river

Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2009
Messages
37
Front page of SBP discusses opposition to the childrens hospital siting at the Mater? Is this Minister Harneys Bertie Bowl? Any thoughts on a good name?

Mary's Magnum Opus??
 
Last edited:

Mushroom

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 27, 2009
Messages
15,777
Harney's Folly (or is that name already reserved for the HSE)?
 

Observing

Member
Joined
May 26, 2010
Messages
9
I read the article in the SBP. Why is nobody questioning the fact that the hospital will cost 650 million - 250 million more than the Department of Health itself believes it should cost? Crazy given there are wards closed in Crumlin and mounting waiting lists for the sick children in this country.
 

jackdee

New member
Joined
Apr 1, 2010
Messages
1
Funnily enough, I was just thinking recently that the Bertie Bowl location at Abbottstown would have been the perfect location for the new hospital:

- No land aquisition cost
- Direct access to M50 - access infrastructure already planned out
- Beside Blanchardstown Hospital
- Beside rail line

No Brainer
 

Nipper

Well-known member
Joined
May 19, 2009
Messages
2,550
I read the article in the SBP. Why is nobody questioning the fact that the hospital will cost 650 million - 250 million more than the Department of Health itself believes it should cost? Crazy given there are wards closed in Crumlin and mounting waiting lists for the sick children in this country.

Is Noel Smyth involved in this one?
 

Macy

Well-known member
Joined
May 22, 2007
Messages
772
Funnily enough, I was just thinking recently that the Bertie Bowl location at Abbottstown would have been the perfect location for the new hospital:

- No land aquisition cost
- Direct access to M50 - access infrastructure already planned out
- Beside Blanchardstown Hospital
- Beside rail line

No Brainer
Anywhere but city centre. The justification that parents would be bringing sick children in by public transport was always nonsense. Somewhere accessable from the national road network is the most logical for what is supposed to be a National Children's Hospital.

The Mater site isn't even convenient for most of Dublin!
 

Rocky

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 9, 2004
Messages
8,550
Anywhere but city centre. The justification that parents would be bringing sick children in by public transport was always nonsense. Somewhere accessable from the national road network is the most logical for what is supposed to be a National Children's Hospital.

The Mater site isn't even convenient for most of Dublin!
Of course not.

As well as being convenient for Dublin, Tallaght also would have been convenient for most of Leinster due to it's proximity to the M50, but it wasn't in Bertie's constituency so it went to Maher and that is the only reason the Maher was picked. The article said as much yesterday.
 

Thac0man

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 13, 2006
Messages
6,482
Twitter
twit taa woo
The issue that is formenting objection to the new childrens hospitol is co-location, not the location itself. Whose interests are being served here in objecting and finding spurious grounds to object? Not patients. The use of private facilities would deliver lower cost and waiting lists to certain tests, even basic ones like x-rays, which can literally take months to get through HSE administered services.

We are in a situation where people are actually dying while waiting for a diagnosis test from the HSE. The basic truth is this, the public health service cannot deliver and is not delivering. In terms of cost and efficiency it is a failure. The solution is not to pump more money in, but to spend it more wisely.

The HSE is an acknowledged failure. But that failure cannot be divorced from the system it administers and can do little to alter in order to deliver better care. As long as health care is free to our most needy and delivered efficiently, who cares if the building, staff or machines used are state owned or paid for assets? Who is the system aimed at pleasing?

In any health service time taken to deliver services is critical. In the time it takes an ill citizen to get a full diagnosis through the HSE the private sector can nearly build and staff a new hospitol. That sort of proformance is something that HSE could never deliever. On every level; staff, buildings, drugs, equipment, the HSE is paying more and getting and delivering less.

Co-location is a must. What is saved through private sector efficiency of service could be used to better deploy community and preventitive health care.
 

cry freedom

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 8, 2009
Messages
2,400
The issue that is formenting objection to the new childrens hospitol is co-location, not the location itself. Whose interests are being served here in objecting and finding spurious grounds to object? Not patients. The use of private facilities would deliver lower cost and waiting lists to certain tests, even basic ones like x-rays, which can literally take months to get through HSE administered services.

We are in a situation where people are actually dying while waiting for a diagnosis test from the HSE. The basic truth is this, the public health service cannot deliver and is not delivering. In terms of cost and efficiency it is a failure. The solution is not to pump more money in, but to spend it more wisely.

The HSE is an acknowledged failure. But that failure cannot be divorced from the system it administers and can do little to alter in order to deliver better care. As long as health care is free to our most needy and delivered efficiently, who cares if the building, staff or machines used are state owned or paid for assets? Who is the system aimed at pleasing?

In any health service time taken to deliver services is critical. In the time it takes an ill citizen to get a full diagnosis through the HSE the private sector can nearly build and staff a new hospitol. That sort of proformance is something that HSE could never deliever. On every level; staff, buildings, drugs, equipment, the HSE is paying more and getting and delivering less.

Co-location is a must. What is saved through private sector efficiency of service could be used to better deploy community and preventitive health care.
In one of the last interviews he gave before his untimely death Maurice Nelligan castigated the building of the New Childrens Hospital at The Mater.
A 16 storey building, shoehorned into an unsuitable site, with a 4 storey carpark underground.?
Let it be our tribute to this man's memory that we stop this nonsense now.
Ms. Harney, we won't all be able to speed our sick children around to this hospital in a state car.
Please, please, show us some mercy and compassion here, if there is any still left in you.

U]
 

cry freedom

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 8, 2009
Messages
2,400
The issue that is formenting objection to the new childrens hospitol is co-location, not the location itself. Whose interests are being served here in objecting and finding spurious grounds to object? Not patients. The use of private facilities would deliver lower cost and waiting lists to certain tests, even basic ones like x-rays, which can literally take months to get through HSE administered services.

We are in a situation where people are actually dying while waiting for a diagnosis test from the HSE. The basic truth is this, the public health service cannot deliver and is not delivering. In terms of cost and efficiency it is a failure. The solution is not to pump more money in, but to spend it more wisely.

The HSE is an acknowledged failure. But that failure cannot be divorced from the system it administers and can do little to alter in order to deliver better care. As long as health care is free to our most needy and delivered efficiently, who cares if the building, staff or machines used are state owned or paid for assets? Who is the system aimed at pleasing?

In any health service time taken to deliver services is critical. In the time it takes an ill citizen to get a full diagnosis through the HSE the private sector can nearly build and staff a new hospitol. That sort of proformance is something that HSE could never deliever. On every level; staff, buildings, drugs, equipment, the HSE is paying more and getting and delivering less.

Co-location is a must. What is saved through private sector efficiency of service could be used to better deploy community and preventitive health care.
Correct location is also a must!
 

Samell

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 6, 2010
Messages
1,103
Front page of SBP discusses opposition to the childrens hospital siting at the Mater? Is this Minister Harneys Bertie Bowl? Any thoughts on a good name?

Mary's Magnum Opus??
HSE, Harney's Spurious Edifice
AIB, Admitted Incompetent Bureaucracy
MCH, Mary's Cronies Hodgpoge,
PPARS, P1ss Poor Area Research Showed
HIQA, Harneys Ignorance Quality Abandoned.
:rolleyes:
 

cry freedom

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 8, 2009
Messages
2,400
Front page of SBP discusses opposition to the childrens hospital siting at the Mater? Is this Minister Harneys Bertie Bowl? Any thoughts on a good name?

Mary's Magnum Opus??
Blessed Mary's Miserycordia?
 

deiseguy

Well-known member
Joined
May 11, 2009
Messages
1,346
To paraphrase her "it's being built in the wrong place at the wrong time for the wrong political reasons" when refering to Waterford Airport she went on to say that there would be no more support for it. Not going to be a problem for the hospital for the moment.
 

laidback

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 3, 2009
Messages
1,134
Didn't 'experts' advise on this matter, and pick the Mater site?

Who were the experts?

How independent were they?

And how independent can you be as an Irish company hoping to get future state contracts?

As they say pick the right experts and give them the right terms of reference...
 
B

boo-boo

Mary's Bertie

There is apparently a shortage in funds to build the new Nat. Children's hospital - the government has pledged 400m whereas the capital cost of building the hospital is 650million.:eek:

And I heard it on Today's news, that the chairman of the new hospital resigned last week and Harney has refused to say why he resigned.

Maybe, he realised the project is a complete non-runner!
 

spidermom

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 13, 2008
Messages
9,189

cry freedom

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 8, 2009
Messages
2,400
Today @ PK, RTE radio 1, Wed 13th approx 1015 onward.
If you missed it get on line and tune in.
Devastating.
 
Top