- Feb 27, 2010
Please explain why a code that pledges to "Treat everyone equally, fairly and with dignity regardless of gender or gender identity, sexual orientation, ethnicity, cultural or religious background, age or disability" is now suddenly a second class belief that must give way before one man's religious prejudice?Why?
Rugby Australia and Qantas both publicly espouse particular doctrinal beliefs, beliefs that are not universally shared - why are they entitled to have public beliefs? What has gay marriage got to do with rugby administration or flying planes?
Not only have Rugby Australia and Qantas promoted their beliefs, but they seek to censor and punish someone who disagrees with their beliefs.
Folau is demanding an "equal" treatment for his religious prejudice that he will not allow to gay people.