• It has come to our attention that some users may have been "banned" when they tried to change their passwords after the site was hacked due to a glitch in the old vBulletin software. This would have occurred around the end of February and does not apply after the site was converted to Xenforo. If you believe you were affected by this, please contact a staff member or use the Contact us link at the bottom of any forum page.

Israel should extend its security fence on the West Bank


L'Chaim

Well-known member
Joined
May 2, 2007
Messages
18,967
A woman and her three daughters were injured on today in a car accident caused by stones hurled by Palestinians on Route 5 connecting Tel Aviv and Ariel.

One of the girls, aged three, was critically wounded, while the mother, 40, and her two other daughters, ages four and five, sustained moderate injuries.

A truck that veered off course crashed into the woman's car as a result of stone throwing. A bus was also hit by stones and its driver sustained light wounds.

Prior to the crash, many drivers reported that Palestinians were hurling stones at cars

3-year-old critically injured by stones in West Bank - Israel News, Ynetnews

Now these stone trowing incidents are regular occurrences. It shows that palestinian groups in the West Bank are not, as they claim, following a non-violent approach. What happens regularly is that palestinian groups will always succumb to the temptation to make life unlivable for Jews. The temptation is great because it is so easy.....a potshot here and there, throwing stones, perhaps a bomb or two. And in light of these types of attacks against Israelis I think Israel should seriously look at extending its security fence and cut off areas to palestinians where these palestinian groups use those areas to attack Israelis from. And if people complain then they should be made aware that these security measures are being put in place to protect Israelis from attack by palestinian groups. Extend the fence and cut off areas that are used by palestinians to attack Israelis. And if that upsets the palestinian side of the conflict then tough!
 

harshreality

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 14, 2011
Messages
2,688
Fence???

This is a fence,



I suspect you mean something more like this,



Am I right?
 

CookieMonster

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 19, 2005
Messages
34,801
*insert "but what about: references to everything jews have ever done wrong anywhere" here*

*insert additional links to dodgy souces*

*insert token ref to Israeli media site*

*insert reference to "Hasbarists"*

*insert veiled Israel/Nazi comparison*

*insert standard "i'm not an anti-semite" line here*

ENDS
 

RobertW

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 11, 2011
Messages
20,483
*insert "but what about: references to everything jews have ever done wrong anywhere" here*

*insert additional links to dodgy souces*

*insert token ref to Israeli media site*

*insert reference to "Hasbarists"*

*insert veiled Israel/Nazi comparison*

*insert standard "i'm not an anti-semite" line here*

ENDS
*Insert a complete denial of Israeli atrocities in the region. . . Only they don't use stones*
 

IrishWelshCelt

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 13, 2012
Messages
2,664
I didnt know Alan Shatter was on P.ie?
 

brughahaha

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 1, 2009
Messages
15,304
*insert "but what about: references to everything jews have ever done wrong anywhere" here*

*insert additional links to dodgy souces*

*insert token ref to Israeli media site*

*insert reference to "Hasbarists"*

*insert veiled Israel/Nazi comparison*

*insert standard "i'm not an anti-semite" line here*

ENDS
I thought the OP was the most stupid post I ever read on P.ie ... but then you outdid it ...well done

BTW I would have thought encouraging debate on the website would be the most basic function of a Moderator ....obviously everywhere except P.ie :roll:
 

CookieMonster

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 19, 2005
Messages
34,801
I thought the OP was the most stupid post I ever read on P.ie ... but then you outdid it ...well done

BTW I would have thought encouraging debate on the website would be the most basic function of a Moderator ....obviously everywhere except P.ie :roll:
I wouldn't consider what you lot do as debate. It's seems more likely to be an experiment attempting to disprove Albert Einstein's definition of insanity.
 

drummed

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 22, 2010
Messages
37,438
Right, here's our chance. The second Tim Horgan gets here build a wall around this thread and never let the usual suspects out onto the main forum to bother us with their silly obsession again.
 

brughahaha

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 1, 2009
Messages
15,304
I wouldn't consider what you lot do as debate. It's seems more likely to be an experiment attempting to disprove Albert Einstein's definition of insanity.
So as a moderator you accept that you deliberately try and disrupt debates and thread as well as posters you disagree with
You seem to misunderstand the difference between moderation and censorship

Not very bright are you ( a common problem with zionists)
 

L'Chaim

Well-known member
Joined
May 2, 2007
Messages
18,967
But the Apartheid wall and fence has been condemned as illegal under international law, so you are just being silly again.
No it's not. But even if it was deemed to be against International law at the time of the ICJ ruling, the court ruled that provisions of international law regarding right to self defense are inapplicable, since there is no state involved other than Israel. And as such the court ruled that it had jurisdiction over the case, and that it involved only a dispute between Israel and the UN, rather than a dispute between Israel and the Palestinians or another party. Since then the UN has recognised palestine as a state so the ICJ decision, as an argument, doesn't really hold water any more
 

Morgellons

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 24, 2012
Messages
5,056
If there's any jobs for Irish sub-contractors in this then heck yes, build away!
 

brughahaha

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 1, 2009
Messages
15,304
No it's not. But even if it was deemed to be against International law at the time of the ICJ ruling, the court ruled that provisions of international law regarding right to self defense are inapplicable, since there is no state involved other than Israel. And as such the court ruled that it had jurisdiction over the case, and that it involved only a dispute between Israel and the UN, rather than a dispute between Israel and the Palestinians or another party. Since then the UN has recognised palestine as a state so the ICJ decision, as an argument, doesn't really hold water any more
Its the zionist and international law version of Fidelma Healy and the internet FFS!!:D:D:D
 
Top