Says it all really. Bigotry and racism are two sides of the same Unionist coin. John Taylor has form in these things and was one of the hardliners in the old Stormont regime. He once said on Peter Taylor's BBC LOYALISTS programme that 'most Unionists had a sneaking regard for Loyalist paramilitaries' and that 'Loyalists served a good purpose as they showed Nationalists what violence was like'.
Very lucid and persuasive indeed. Made an utter balls of himself today in a tweet about Leo Varadkar. He's almost as big a clown as you are and that takes some effort. :lol:I heard him on Newstalk yesterday morning.
Not only did he not sound senile, had I been from Donegal, I probably would have found myself signing up. He was very lucid and persuasive.
He certainly made a fool out of Coleman, who took the same puerile line as you.
That’s about as likely as Donegal voting to join NI.Since Glasgow Celtic has just had their arse handed to them, it would make perfect sense for Glasgow aDonegallions to embrace their fellow Ulster yen’s, bend the knee and hug the Teddy Bears,.
You missed my point that there was an arbitrariness to the border and small differences in allegiance could have seen Donegal and Monaghan transferred to the the control of Orange Supremacy. How then might then your political worldview have diverged from now where you support clientelism and partitionist chancers like Ray Burke and Bertie who thought being against republicanism would make the Dublin Establishment more likely to ignore their corruption. .Dry your eyes, mate.
I cant vote in the north for the SDLP.
You do know donegal isn't in the north, rite!
so his excuse is he used Indian as shorthand for PM or Leo or Boss etc etc because he ran out of words? lol..what a ****ing clown!!
Also said he didn't know how to spell his name but.....so his excuse is he used Indian as shorthand for PM or Leo or Boss etc etc because he ran out of words? lol..what a ****ing clown!!
He claimed that the tweet he sent was because he had too use shorthand as u can only use a certain amount of words in a tweet but in the 1st tweet he used 19 words but in the 2nd tweet he used 41 words, so his explanation does not add up