MacSharry offers his opinions on restoring the public finances

flavirostris

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 21, 2007
Messages
24,571
Interesting article in the Indo, where Mac the Knife talks about dealing with the current budget deficit

It is time to draw the knife. First for the chop would be the dozens of government quangos; including, it seems, the biggest of them all, the HSE.

"I often wonder what government departments are doing at the moment. Look at the Department of Health, which seems to have no say in anything, while the HSE is spending €16bn a year.

"All these quangos should have their functions transferred back to the relevant departments. I believe that could be done quickly, despite what they say."

Jobs will have to go too. Despite taking on the work of the quangos, the public service will have to cut its numbers.

"There will have to be voluntary redundancies," MacSharry says.

"We are told it would cost too much, but they will have to find a way to pay for it.

"We must accept that we cannot afford the size of public service that we have now."
He also seems to call for another Tallaght Strategy

He hints at something even more radical than the Tallaght Strategy -- a 'Grand Coalition' of Fianna Fail and Fine Gael.

"About two-thirds of the electorate always vote for these two centrist parties. You then get coalitions towards the right, as with the PDs, or towards the left with Labour. But the bulk of the people favour the centre.

"The differences between Fianna Fail and Fine Gael were founded on the national question and, thank goodness, that is no longer the great issue. So there is no huge difference between them and some areas where they would support each other,"
I doubt somehow if he would be keen on FF pulling on the Green Jersey and giving an FG-Lab government a digout


http://www.independent.ie/business/irish/interview-ray-macsharry-former-finance-minister-and-eu-commissioner-2368756.html
 
Last edited:


Mushroom

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 27, 2009
Messages
15,474
The risk of voluntary redundancies is that, unless they are targeted - which will upset the unions no end - they generally result in the useless and the incompetent remaining, while many of the stressed, the competent and the productive will walk away.
 

slumdog1971

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 24, 2009
Messages
616
The risk of voluntary redundancies is that, unless they are targeted - which will upset the unions no end - they generally result in the useless and the incompetent remaining, while many of the stressed, the competent and the productive will walk away.
Do you have any proof of this ridicilous statement ?
The smart good ones go and the lazy and stupid remain.

Thats the trouble with these discussions forms is they allow every idiot a voice.
 

Mushroom

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 27, 2009
Messages
15,474
Do you have any proof of this ridicilous statement ?
The smart good ones go and the lazy and stupid remain.

Thats the trouble with these discussions forms is they allow every idiot a voice.

Personal experience.

C'est tout et cela suffit.


PS Congrats on self-endorsing your final sentence.
 

droghedasouth

Well-known member
Joined
May 10, 2007
Messages
1,091
Both FF and the LP are public sector union parties.
It would be no easier for FG to reform the public sector with FF than the LP.
So we might as well stick with the LP as a coalition partner who at least are not responsible for the catastrophe and are not a bunch of dead-beat has-beens.
 


New Threads

Popular Threads

Most Replies

Top