New Zealand Change Government.

CountyWarrior

New member
Joined
Nov 2, 2008
Messages
1
After three years consecutive term in office of the present and first female respected prime minister reign Helen Clar finally come to an end, Having voted for a new prime minister John Key, well it seems the world is changing so the new zealanders follows aswell.
 


Pauli

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 22, 2006
Messages
1,181
After three years consecutive term in office of the present and first female respected prime minister reign Helen Clar finally come to an end, Having voted for a new prime minister John Key, well it seems the world is changing so the new zealanders follows aswell.
New Zealand was one of the first countries to realise that neo-liberal economics is rubbish and ditched it in 1996, long before everybody else woke up, rather abruptly, 2 months ago to the fact that it's bollox. So far from following anybody, they seem to be going in another direction. I very much doubt they would return to a proven failure of an economic dogma. So it might be worth having a look at where they are going. We might learn something
 

Bobert

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 28, 2008
Messages
1,071
A black US president, a tory British Government, a possibly FG-Labour government here and now New Zealand?... lads, 2009 could be massive!
 

20000miles

Active member
Joined
Aug 14, 2008
Messages
257
Website
www.irishliberty.wordpress.com
New Zealand was one of the first countries to realise that neo-liberal economics is rubbish and ditched it in 1996, long before everybody else woke up, rather abruptly, 2 months ago to the fact that it's bollox. So far from following anybody, they seem to be going in another direction. I very much doubt they would return to a proven failure of an economic dogma. So it might be worth having a look at where they are going. We might learn something
They're turing centre-right, whereas the US are turning left. The change isn't the same.

But as for economics, the trend for the past 30 years was an embrace of monetarism. Now we seem to be embracing Keynesianism again (another proven failure), and in some countries socialist economics.

Alas, until we realise that freedom is good, governments distort markets, and central banks cause boom/bust cycles, Austrian economics will never see the light of day - and we will never have free markets.
 

Pauli

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 22, 2006
Messages
1,181
They're turing centre-right, whereas the US are turning left. The change isn't the same.

But as for economics, the trend for the past 30 years was an embrace of monetarism. Now we seem to be embracing Keynesianism again (another proven failure), and in some countries socialist economics.

Alas, until we realise that freedom is good, governments distort markets, and central banks cause boom/bust cycles, Austrian economics will never see the light of day - and we will never have free markets.
I agree. They see to be turning centre-right. But having suffered the horrors of neo-liberalism, they won't go back to it. It was one of the reasons Clark was re-elected twice. Which is why I said it might be worth looking at which direction they take.
 

joel

Well-known member
Joined
May 3, 2007
Messages
803
They're turing centre-right, whereas the US are turning left. The change isn't the same.

But as for economics, the trend for the past 30 years was an embrace of monetarism. Now we seem to be embracing Keynesianism again (another proven failure), and in some countries socialist economics.

Alas, until we realise that freedom is good, governments distort markets, and central banks cause boom/bust cycles, Austrian economics will never see the light of day - and we will never have free markets.

Boom/bust is inevitable with Capitalism - as Marx pointed out.
 

Bobert

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 28, 2008
Messages
1,071
They're turing centre-right, whereas the US are turning left. The change isn't the same.

But as for economics, the trend for the past 30 years was an embrace of monetarism. Now we seem to be embracing Keynesianism again (another proven failure), and in some countries socialist economics.

Alas, until we realise that freedom is good, governments distort markets, and central banks cause boom/bust cycles, Austrian economics will never see the light of day - and we will never have free markets.
Sorry? Proven in what case?
 

Defeated Romanticist

Active member
Joined
Apr 12, 2007
Messages
277
New Zealand was one of the first countries to realise that neo-liberal economics is rubbish and ditched it in 1996, long before everybody else woke up, rather abruptly, 2 months ago to the fact that it's bollox. So far from following anybody, they seem to be going in another direction. I very much doubt they would return to a proven failure of an economic dogma. So it might be worth having a look at where they are going. We might learn something
The arse fell out of the New Zealand economy because the British joined the EEC and they bankrupted themselves subsidising agriculture, nothing to do with any kind of right wing economics. As a matter of fact they have one of the most liberal economies in the world.

They tried keynesianism in the 1980s ironically with the national party, buildinf white elephants everywhere on the tax payers shilling and it only sank the country into debt.

The Labour party there is as left wing as Bachelet or Blair, not exactly revolutionaries or Leninists like you
 

Bom

Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2008
Messages
54
change

The NZ government changed for reasons consistent with my own personal worldview and with reference to pet prejudices in contested economic theories which I have decided to cling to with a fierce desperation...as if my life depended on it....
 

20000miles

Active member
Joined
Aug 14, 2008
Messages
257
Website
www.irishliberty.wordpress.com
Sorry? Proven in what case?
USA 1930s, Japan 1990s, Stagflation 1970s...

As an economic theory, it is a rehash of classical economic theories that has been debunked - it blames booms and busts on "waxing and waning of animal spirits" (!!), completely misuderstands capital theory and aggregates the economy to the point where you can't see what's really going on.

These powerpoints are the best visual analysies on Keynesian v. Hayekian macroeconomics:

VISIONS AND FRAMEWORKS IN MACROECONOMICS


In short, Keynesianism is to economics what Creationism is to biology.
 

PBP voter

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 18, 2015
Messages
9,202
He will carry on with the neo-liberalism and the discrimination against the native people.
 


New Threads

Popular Threads

Most Replies

Top