• It has come to our attention that some users may have been "banned" when they tried to change their passwords after the site was hacked due to a glitch in the old vBulletin software. This would have occurred around the end of February and does not apply after the site was converted to Xenforo. If you believe you were affected by this, please contact a staff member or use the Contact us link at the bottom of any forum page.

Press TV - "White House seeks to remove Obama"


Cassandra Syndrome

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 23, 2009
Messages
16,908
Ah yes, that Friday feeling. Plus this article should rattle a few Obamatron cages to boot.

A US analyst says some officials in the White House and the administration are considering legal action to remove Barack Obama from presidency.


"Right now, there is discussion in Washington and within the government of using the 25th amendment to the US Constitution to remove Obama from office," Edward Spannaus from Executive Intelligence Review said in an interview with Press TV on Friday.

The amendment allows for removing the president if he/she has incapacity either physically or mentally.

"In this case, Obama is mentally incapable of fulfilling the office of president," Spannaus went on to say.

Referring to Obama's plummeting popularity, mostly due to the recent economic collapse in the US, Spannaus said, "There is no way that his presidency could be salvaged at this point and it does not really make any difference who wins the congressional elections."

"He was not qualified to be the president in the first place. He was put in there precisely because he would act as a puppet and they knew he would be a puppet for Wall Street, for the London financiers and for the British," Spannaus added.

A recent survey from Gallup has revealed that more than half of American voters would not support the incumbent US president's re-election.

A recent survey from Gallup has revealed that more than half of American voters would not support the re-election of President Barack Obama.
PressTV - 'White House seeks to remove Obama'
 

Goober

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 26, 2010
Messages
370
All smoke and mirrors IMO. Incompetence is not an impeachable offense. Abuse of power or failure to uphold his responsibilities in regard to his oath of office, are impeachable offenses. Even if his administration did in fact offer Joe Sestak a job in order to drop out of the US Senate race - which is an impeachable offense, it will never be proven that the offer came from the President. (And if Sestak loses to Toomey next month, maybe Joe should have taken that job offer that was never given :cool:). Also, in regards to impeachment, two-thirds of the senators must vote for conviction, and that won’t happen. Our best bet to stop the devastation of the country, orchestrated by this President’s agenda, is for the GOP to make great strides in the November election, stop his future far left judicial appointments that he will make in order to legislate from the bench if in fact the Democrats lose control of Congress, and ultimately make a permanent change come 2012.
 
Joined
Sep 5, 2009
Messages
1,757
Can you imagine the Race Riots there would be should that happen, which it won't of course. It's ridiculous.
 

Clanrickard

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 25, 2008
Messages
33,038
Ah yes, that Friday feeling. Plus this article should rattle a few Obamatron cages to boot.
PressTV - 'White House seeks to remove Obama'[/url]
You mean PressTV the English language organ of the regime in Tehran whose chief thinks the Messiah is living down a well north of Tehran and he was bather in a white light while speaking to the UN General Assembly? That PressTV?
 

khavakoz

Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2007
Messages
73
You just gotta love the genesis of this story.

Executive Intelligence Review is the news journal of the LaRouche movement - variously described as Fascist, Marxist or Cultish, but always antisemitic and happy to follow every conspiracy which can be peddled. For example, the LaRouche crowd have claimed in recent memory that Elizabeth II is the head of international drugs smuggling ring, and that the Oklahoma City bombing was the first-strike in a revanchist Hanoverian-UK invasion of the US.

Ed Spannaus stood trial with Lyndon LaRouche for federal mail fraud and defrauding the Inland Revenue Service in the 1980s, he was convicted of the mail fraud (which phrase covers a whole lot in US federal law) and served half of a five year sentence.

So the lunatic ravings of a convicted fraudster are published in the journal of a demented conspiracist movement, which is in turn rebroadcast by PressTV - the international face of Iran's unhinged political masters - and you think this is a serious story?

Whence your usual conspiracist nonsense? Lyndon's mailing list? Or his laughable publications?
 

ballot stuffer

Well-known member
Joined
May 21, 2007
Messages
1,503
Ah yes the ever reliable Iranian press tv.

What next Cassandra Syndrome, some hard hitting investigative journalism from Pravda?
 

kerdasi amaq

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 24, 2009
Messages
4,690
If the story's a load of bull; then nothing's going to happen, right?

I like Obama in the White House, because he's unqualified to be there. Every decision he makes, every law he signs, as purported President is null and void.
 

gijoe

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 26, 2010
Messages
15,419
There is a great Press TV clip of George Galloway and some other guy talking about flying a plane into Gaza with Nelson Mandela or Bishop Desmond Tutu on board so that the Israelis would not shooot it down on the Toireasa Ferris thread. Comedy gold.
 

ocoonassa

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 14, 2010
Messages
6,130
"He was put in there precisely because he would act as a puppet and they knew he would be a puppet for Wall Street, for the London financiers and for the British"
I wonder could there possibly at all be even a whiff of truth in this part of the story? Does anybody know the facts of the matter?
 

Clanrickard

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 25, 2008
Messages
33,038
If the story's a load of bull; then nothing's going to happen, right?

I like Obama in the White House, because he's unqualified to be there. Every decision he makes, every law he signs, as purported President is null and void.
He is the democratically elected president of the US so he is "qualified". I realise his skim might be a problem for the likes of you hey that is just tough.
 

kerdasi amaq

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 24, 2009
Messages
4,690
The fact that he is "democratically" elected means nothing. He was not qualified to stand for election; so his election is also null and void.

The DemocRATS made a big boo-boo there.
 

anewbeginning

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 20, 2009
Messages
4,628
The US is heading for a very dark period politically.

The Tea Party are incredibily immature. One of their main policies is that the government should provide nothing, and the private sector should do everything. Does that include policing I wonder. There are also completely against Obama's healthcare reforms that give healthcare insurance to those who can't really afford it.

Obama inherited an economy in a shambles due to the financial meltdown. He cannot really be blamed for the sluggish nature of the economy.

Give me Obama over the Tea Party any day.
 

USER1234

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 31, 2009
Messages
9,357
The fact that he is "democratically" elected means nothing. He was not qualified to stand for election; so his election is also null and void.

The DemocRATS made a big boo-boo there.
Some real proof please, at the moment all there is the insane ramblings of nutters and racists!!!!

Until some real verifiable proof is shown he is the legally and democratically elected president (not that i think that will change as there is no proof to be found)!!!
 

niropiro

Active member
Joined
Jul 6, 2010
Messages
227
Before Obama moved into the White House, the Secret Secret were briefed that if they encountered a 'tall black man wearing a bathrobe eating cold chicken and watermelon out of the refridgerator at 3 am' they were informed that they 'did not, did NOT, have authorisation to shoot on sight.'
Also when Obama first boarded Air Force One there was a tense stand off when the President took issue with and refused to comply with the directive from the crew 'to move to the back of the plane like a good negro.'
 

Clanrickard

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 25, 2008
Messages
33,038
The fact that he is "democratically" elected means nothing. He was not qualified to stand for election; so his election is also null and void.

The DemocRATS made a big boo-boo there.
What do you mean "it means nothing"? He was elected end of.
 
Top