Responsibility, members of the Oireachtas, and the shrinking violets at Cabinet

He3

Moderator
Joined
Oct 1, 2008
Messages
17,077
We all live busy lives, if we are lucky, and we delegate political decision making to professional politicians. When they drop the ball where exactly does political responsibility lie?

The staff numbers in the Dept of the Taoiseach has risen, according to reports, from 30 to 300 in recent years. That department and DoF call the shots - or at least they call the shots they are allowed to call within the framework of our EU membership obligations.

Political power does not reside in the Dáil anymore, maybe it never did. Here is an effort to explain why:

In the midst of the gravest crisis to afflict the State since the Civil War, our national parliament has no role to play, 141 of our 166 elected representatives have no function. They stand by, as mere onlookers, while the remaining 15 decide in secret the fate of the country.

Most of these 15 TDs (members of the Cabinet) who do have a role were part of what we now realise was the disastrous decision to bail out all the financial institutions. A majority of these 15 were complicit in the decisions and non-decisions over the last decade that have pushed the country into this fiasco.

These people, who on their record have proved themselves incompetent, are again the decision-makers on issues that could propel us into an even deeper crisis in a few months. And the other 141 TDs stand by and do nothing. Many of them have the capacity to prevent this but won’t (ie the Fianna Fáil TDs who are not Cabinet Ministers and the four Green TDs, plus a few Independents).


Crisis makes plain the irrelevance of Dáil - The Irish Times - Wed, Oct 06, 2010

Even his claim that 15 are responsible is not accepted readily. One or two of the 15 are reported to have written to their (Green) party members disclaiming responsibility.

That if true would leave 13. One of those - grandson of De Valera - last night disclaimed responsibility. That if true would bring it down to 12.

Why are we paying these people to take responsibility if they do not actually take responsibility?

I must be missing something and look forward to being enlightened.

Maybe there is scope for a thread on Responsibility and the Senior Civil Servants also.
 
Last edited:


Traharter

Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2009
Messages
37
Mmmmm, to my mind, 166 minus 15 is actually 151....I know our maths haven't been great lately, but.....
 

He3

Moderator
Joined
Oct 1, 2008
Messages
17,077
Mmmmm, to my mind, 166 minus 15 is actually 151....I know our maths haven't been great lately, but.....
Well spotted. VB's numbers don't always add up...
 

Traharter

Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2009
Messages
37
The point he makes is certainly worthy of a debate but VB is the one who brings up "arithmetic credibility"....
 

antsrathcam

Active member
Joined
Jul 29, 2010
Messages
211
He3,

the responsibility lies with the electorate.

We do not live in a dictatorship; we live in a democracy now matter how imperfect.

The next time the Irish people go to vote they should think long and hard before they cast a vote for:

a neighbour;

a relative;

a friend of a friend;

someone who is "nice";

someone who showed up at Uncle Seán's funeral;

someone who did, or could do them a small favour.


I'm not holding my breath. Maybe 15-20 years down the road.
 

farnaby

Well-known member
Joined
May 15, 2006
Messages
1,930
That if true would leave 13. One of those - grandson of De Valera - last night disclaimed responsibility. That if true would bring it down to 12.
He actually denied responsibility on behalf of the whole of FF, so we're straight to zero.

Deflecting responsibility is the strongest political reflex in our system. The second strongest is to lie about the true depth of the crisis with the excuse that "sshhh the bond markets are listening, we have to lie". Our system is literally hollowed out, with no ethical grounding; and with no anchor is thrown all over the place by global depression, bond market whims and EU warnings.

There is a crippling lack of honesty, strength (to take responsibility and to stand up to anyone with wealth or power), prudence (right decision-making) and justice (limiting the pain and distributing it fairly). (And let's not get started on the last cardinal virtue, temperance...)

With no virtue we will soon have no society.
 

He3

Moderator
Joined
Oct 1, 2008
Messages
17,077
I see the point you make but am not sure it is right. Would you say it was the patient's fault if the doctor they consult makes a mess of treating them?

He3,

the responsibility lies with the electorate.

We do not live in a dictatorship; we live in a democracy now matter how imperfect.

The next time the Irish people go to vote they should think long and hard before they cast a vote for:

a neighbour;

a relative;

a friend of a friend;

someone who is "nice";

someone who showed up at Uncle Seán's funeral;

someone who did, or could do them a small favour.


I'm not holding my breath. Maybe 15-20 years down the road.
 

LeDroit

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 11, 2010
Messages
1,768
No, no. You're missing the wonderful nature of 'collective cabinet responsibility'. It means that individuals are never responsible. The 'Cabinet' is responsible. Therefore individuals can never be sacked for what that bold Cabinet did. There's even immunity from prosecution for individuals in the Cabinet because they are powerless to stop it's terrible collective power.

Sure, you can even reject that infernal Cabinet's decision and still sit in it. It's beautiful. I think it's one of Dev's greatest achievements in a constitution designed from tip to toe to prevent accountability.
 

Monday Monday

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 9, 2009
Messages
1,331
No, no. You're missing the wonderful nature of 'collective cabinet responsibility'. It means that individuals are never responsible. The 'Cabinet' is responsible. Therefore individuals can never be sacked for what that bold Cabinet did. There's even immunity from prosecution for individuals in the Cabinet because they are powerless to stop it's terrible collective power.

Sure, you can even reject that infernal Cabinet's decision and still sit in it. It's beautiful. I think it's one of Dev's greatest achievements in a constitution designed from tip to toe to prevent accountability.
The "Cabinet" referred to in the constitution and by all Fianna Fail ministers is a wooden cupbord in the Taoiseachs office used to hold glasses and a Waterford crystal decanter.


We don't do accountability in this country.
 

myrak

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 18, 2010
Messages
472
He3,

the responsibility lies with the electorate.

We do not live in a dictatorship; we live in a democracy now matter how imperfect.

The next time the Irish people go to vote they should think long and hard before they cast a vote for:

a neighbour;

a relative;

a friend of a friend;

someone who is "nice";

someone who showed up at Uncle Seán's funeral;

someone who did, or could do them a small favour.


I'm not holding my breath. Maybe 15-20 years down the road.

And when will we get to vote? Before or after the point of no return?
The govt is currently blocking 3 by-elections.
The need for a 'pre 4 year budget' election is being ignored.
And of course when we DO vote some of the 'elected' move the goalposts
...like the anti FF Greens going in with FF.
Its NOT all down to the electorate.
 

He3

Moderator
Joined
Oct 1, 2008
Messages
17,077
On morning Ireland now.
 

He3

Moderator
Joined
Oct 1, 2008
Messages
17,077
O Cuiv given free rein. Burton peppered with interruptions.

Which was right on the guarantee?
 

antsrathcam

Active member
Joined
Jul 29, 2010
Messages
211
I see the point you make but am not sure it is right. Would you say it was the patient's fault if the doctor they consult makes a mess of treating them?
I see your point. But to continue the analogy, is the patient not to blame when he continues to go back to the same incompetent, unqualified doctor?
 

antsrathcam

Active member
Joined
Jul 29, 2010
Messages
211
And when will we get to vote? Before or after the point of no return?
The govt is currently blocking 3 by-elections.
The need for a 'pre 4 year budget' election is being ignored.
And of course when we DO vote some of the 'elected' move the goalposts
...like the anti FF Greens going in with FF.
Its NOT all down to the electorate.
We got to vote a few years ago.

We knew the story of how the Belmullet gas was sold to Shell. We elected Fahey.

We knew how Lowry had been caught for tax. We elected Lowry.

All over the country we elected politicians who had no experience of running an enterprise, a department, or indeed anything. Country solicitors, property developers and ex-teachers topped the polls. Elected on personal contacts, and ability to deliver for the constituency, rather than the country.

The people get the Government they deserve. Last time, next time.
 

He3

Moderator
Joined
Oct 1, 2008
Messages
17,077
Words fail me at this point

Tánaiste Mary Coughlan has said the Department of Enterprise has not yet decided whether or not the so-called 'leave and return' scheme introduced at Aer Lingus two years ago qualifies as redundancy

RT News: Dept unsure over Aer Lingus redundancies
 


New Threads

Popular Threads

Most Replies

Top