Closing it will be huge. A massive win for Life.A key test will be whether the last abortion clinic in Missouri is forced to close or whether SCOTUS stops it. A federal judge has put a stay on the closure for now but media say its likely just a temporary reprieve.
It won't really be though. If anything, it will definitely cause some born human women to die, so nobody wins here.Closing it will be huge. A massive win for Life.
Wohhhhhhh!!!!!It won't really be though. If anything, it will definitely cause some born human women to die, so nobody wins here.
Also, what do you think should be done with all the unwanted children who might be born if this goes through?
I'm curious as to what solutions you think would work for them to grow up mentally, emotionally and physically healthy?
Now, now Peter, don't be dishonest. So please engage with the actual words written and not whatever you want them to be please.Wohhhhhhh!!!!!
Are you actually saying that people who have gone through fostering or been adopted are worthy of less rights to life than others?
Also. Who are these woman who will die?
Biden looking like a flip-flopper.
His campaign issued that statement saying he doesn't support repealing the Hyde Amendment.
But CNN has just played tape of an exchange he had with a woman who called on him to support repealing the Hyde Amendment and he was saying "it has to go".
No I think that is a different law, it is a 2015 law that banned abortion by "dilation and evacuation" in the 2nd trimester, which is when most abortions take place.
There is comfort there, but just a crumb.Justice Clarence Thomas wrote in a concurring opinion that he agreed the court should not hear the case, but called it a "stark reminder that our abortion jurisprudence has spiraled out of control."
"Although this case does not present the opportunity to address our demonstrably erroneous 'undue burden' standard, we cannot continue blinking the reality of what this court has wrought," Thomas wrote.
He's been banging that drum for 27 yrs and it hasnt happened.No I think that is a different law, it is a 2015 law that banned abortion by "dilation and evacuation" in the 2nd trimester, which is when most abortions take place.
And if you read Clarence Thomas' concurrence, he is clearly indicating that he wants a change.
There is comfort there, but just a crumb.
Yes, but reports say he is "having the time of his life". Putting the boot into poor women should make his day/ week/ month/ year/ decade.He's been banging that drum for 27 yrs and it hasnt happened.