• Before posting anything about COVID-19, READ THIS FIRST! COVID-19 and Misinformation (UPDATED)
    Misinformation and/or conspiracy theories about this topic, even if intended as humor, will not be tolerated!

ShoutingIsLeadership

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 17, 2011
Messages
52,895
Bring drunk can often be successfully used as a defence in court.

If alcohol is a mind-altering substance, rendering one unable to drive properly, then should it be a mitigating factor in drink-drive cases?
 

ruserious

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 3, 2011
Messages
29,862
No. You drink then you accept that your mind will be altered.
 

ShoutingIsLeadership

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 17, 2011
Messages
52,895
Mitigation of sentence is not a defence.
Some judges consider abuse of alcohol an aggravating factor.

It cannot be a mitigating factor for drunk driving. It's certainly not a defence.
Why can't it be a mitigating factor, if it can be in non-drink driving cases?
 

SideysGhost

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 30, 2009
Messages
17,360
Why can't it be a mitigating factor, if it can be in non-drink driving cases?
You'll need to provide evidence that it is seen, by at least one judge, as a mitigating factor in an actual real-live court case before this thread can go anywhere. Never mind demonstrating that any legislation in any country ever allows voluntary drunkenness as an acceptable get-out-of-jail card.
 

GDPR

1
Joined
Jul 5, 2008
Messages
217,741
Drink is usually considered an aggravating not a mitigating factor.

Well that is in the law bukes of course. If you come from a dacent family and you know the local TD ....
 

stopdoingstuff

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 26, 2011
Messages
23,039
Just say you grew up on the wrong side of the tracks, the side with all the off licences.
 

edg

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 14, 2009
Messages
15,030
Bring drunk can often be successfully used as a defence in court.

If alcohol is a mind-altering substance, rendering one unable to drive properly, then should it be a mitigating factor in drink-drive cases?
Being drunk is a terrible defense for any crime. It rarely works.

If you knew what the effects of alcohol were going to have on you (as in get you drunk) then you knew the risks and proceeded anyway.

Its only really works if you somehow claim you got drunk by accident and didn't notice.
 

The Field Marshal

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 27, 2009
Messages
43,651
Just say you grew up on the wrong side of the tracks, the side with all the off licences.
And be sure never to say you threw up on the wrong side of the tracks, the side with all the off licences.
 

cricket

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 7, 2009
Messages
13,786
Bring drunk can often be successfully used as a defence in court.

If alcohol is a mind-altering substance, rendering one unable to drive properly, then should it be a mitigating factor in drink-drive cases?
Am I missing something here ?
 

Old Mr Grouser

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 29, 2009
Messages
6,542
Bring drunk can often be successfully used as a defence in court.

If alcohol is a mind-altering substance, rendering one unable to drive properly, then should it be a mitigating factor in drink-drive cases?
In the real world 'Being Drunk' is an excellent defence against ever being arrested in the first place.

These last twenty years or so there's been a hell of a rumpus over Deaths in Custody; and since most Deaths in Custody were alcohol-related the police have massively reduced such deaths simply by not arresting Drunk and Incapables.

Nowadays, from what I've seen of it, the Met Police just radio for an ambulance and wait till it comes; meanwhile leaving the drunk in the gutter.

Then, the moment the ambulance pulls up, the police run off.

For example - Case 5 | Bulletin 23 –Response to those believed to be drunk and incapable


 

ShoutingIsLeadership

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 17, 2011
Messages
52,895

New Threads

Popular Threads

Most Replies

Top Bottom