Should possession/use of child sex dolls be a crime ?

cyberianpan

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 18, 2006
Messages
16,347
Website
www.google.com
It is not so clear to me why this should be a crime:

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/jun/23/man-import-childlike-sex-doll-uk-jailed
Border Force officers, acting under the direction of the fast parcel joint border intelligence unit, identified a parcel labelled as a mannequin, but which was found to contain an obscene childlike doll.

This was addressed to Dobson and had been purchased from Hong Kong...DC Andy Kent, of Cheshire constabulary’s paedophile and cyber-investigation unit, said: “Knowing child sex dolls exist and are available for sex offenders to buy is sickening.
...
“This conviction is the first of its kind for Cheshire. Cases like these are also very rare across the country. However, I want to make it clear that importing a child sex doll is a criminal offence.
(yes, the other things mentioned are a different matter)

So by extension , what if someone bought a fukkable toy pig ? Etc

cyp

It should be noted that Moderator NYCky who presents here as a Liberal Republican from NYC is nothing of the sort

They are an extreme right wing professional troll, assigned to infiltrate Irish libertarian circles by Russian paid taskmasters

On other social media profiles they present as an attractive Latina lady (Fatima/fadas)

That they have Moderator status here, lets you know all you need to know about p.ie
NYCky Mod is connected with the Mod(conor) who has family in Iveagh House (smiffy), the same Mod who frustrated operations against actual Al Qaudea members here

The Mod Mercurial is also heavily connected with the den of depravity

cyp
 
Last edited:


Prester Jim

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 3, 2009
Messages
9,977
Hullo Cyp ;)
Deeply distasteful though it is, it should probably be legal.
Pedophiles exist, some are as a result of abuse but others are possibly just born that way, it would be completely unacceptable for them to practice as pedophiles, regardless of the law even, it would be horribly destructive to the victims.
There is no victim with these dolls and they are an outlet for them that is hopefully harmless unlike the porn obviously.
It would be necessary to do some studies on the effect of these toys before just leaving them legal long term though, I wouldn't like to find out that they lead to a spike in crime for any reason though that doesn't necessarily follow logically.
 

blokesbloke

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 13, 2011
Messages
22,697
As soon as I saw the title I knew Cyp was back!

Hello dear, I thought they'd banned you or something. Were you just taking a break?
 

GDPR

1
Joined
Jul 5, 2008
Messages
217,846
As soon as I saw the title I knew Cyp was back!

Hello dear, I thought they'd banned you or something. Were you just taking a break?
I see him as prophet (with a small "p") of the near future unless God has Mercy on us.
 

Niall996

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 5, 2011
Messages
11,823

Old Mr Grouser

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 29, 2009
Messages
6,341
Don't be so bloody stupid.

If you can't see why possession of such items is a crime then there's something wrong with you - you have a deformed conscience.

Did you go to a Catholic school? If so then blame the RCC, and consult a good lawyer about the possibility of suing them.

I've already had my say on another thread - http://www.politics.ie/forum/culture-community/256876-sex-dolls-they-coming-28.html#post11214762
 

silverharp

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 21, 2015
Messages
16,302
importing an "indecent object" is a bit vague? its fair enough that he was done for the images
 

Old Mr Grouser

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 29, 2009
Messages
6,341
importing an "indecent object" is a bit vague?

its fair enough that he was done for the images
And you're another idiot.

" It's fair enough", you say; as if every criminal deserves a sporting chance of getting away with it.

What rubbish.

I'm telling you straight - if I had my way I'd shoot the whole bloody lot of them.
 
Last edited:

silverharp

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 21, 2015
Messages
16,302
And you're another idiot.

" It's fair enough", you say; as if every criminal deserves a sporting chance of getting away with it.

What rubbish.

I'm telling you straight - if I had my way I'd shoot the whole bloody lot of them.
relax, you are deliberately misreading what i said , i agree that he should be done for the images he had as he is contributing to the child abuse industry
 

Catalpast

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 17, 2012
Messages
25,564

Niall996

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 5, 2011
Messages
11,823
Don't be so bloody stupid.

If you can't see why possession of such items is a crime then there's something wrong with you - you have a deformed conscience.

Did you go to a Catholic school? If so then blame the RCC, and consult a good lawyer about the possibility of suing them.

I've already had my say on another thread - http://www.politics.ie/forum/culture-community/256876-sex-dolls-they-coming-28.html#post11214762
I don't see how owning a doll can be legally a crime. Please explain.
 

enuffisenuff

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 27, 2011
Messages
3,431
so where does that leave regular toy dolls?
 

Old Mr Grouser

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 29, 2009
Messages
6,341
Don't be so bloody stupid.

If you can't see why possession of such items is a crime then there's something wrong with you - you have a deformed conscience.

Did you go to a Catholic school? If so then blame the RCC, and consult a good lawyer about the possibility of suing them.

I've already had my say on another thread - http://www.politics.ie/forum/culture-community/256876-sex-dolls-they-coming-28.html#post11214762

I don't see how owning a doll can be legally a crime. Please explain.
It promotes paedophilia, and the possession of such a doll would indicate that the possessor is a paedophile enthusiast.

The police and the lawyers can deal with the chapter and verse of the law.
 

Old Mr Grouser

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 29, 2009
Messages
6,341
importing an "indecent object" is a bit vague? its fair enough that he was done for the images
Can't you see that he ownership of the doll was even more indicative of an active paedophile than was the possession of the images?
 

GDPR

1
Joined
Jul 5, 2008
Messages
217,846
It promotes paedophilia, and the possession of such a doll would indicate that the possessor is a paedophile enthusiast.

The police and the lawyers can deal with the chapter and verse of the law.
Cyp started a thread suggesting that creating human clones with the intelligence of a German Sheppard dog to be sex slaves might well be ethically fine- I agree with you about the dolls but that topic disturbs me a lot more. I'm not completely sure that some sickos among the West's present Ruling Elite haven't already have had such unfortunate creatures made for their sick pleasures. The thing is though that no society can flout the laws of nature no mind God as Cyp and his ilk are desiring and survive for long....

[video=youtube;W5K1U0SrRiw]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W5K1U0SrRiw[/video]
 

GDPR

1
Joined
Jul 5, 2008
Messages
217,846
If you feed hatred in your soul, it only grows...The same thing with lust. These dolls will only make the perverts more perverse.
 

Niall996

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 5, 2011
Messages
11,823
It promotes paedophilia, and the possession of such a doll would indicate that the possessor is a paedophile enthusiast.

The police and the lawyers can deal with the chapter and verse of the law.
Owning a doll promotes paedophilia?? So because of people like you, we now have to set up a commission, spend millions on lawyers to define and determine the precise specifics of what constitutes a sex doll versus a mannequin versus human art reproduction versus dolls for sex education classes versus...any number of variables and infinite nuances to pore over for years. What about school girl uniforms in sex shops, should they be illegal? Was Britney Spears 'Hit Me Baby One More TIme' a call to action to all Paedo's in the world? Or maybe, just maybe, you let whoever wants to ************************ away in the privacy of their home do what they want once it's not impacting on another. And a doll is a lump of plastic. It isn't another person.
 

Politics matters

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 16, 2012
Messages
6,342
Ah CYP, I hadn't seen you post here in a while, and of course when I saw the title, I knew it was you!!!!
 
Last edited:

silverharp

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 21, 2015
Messages
16,302
Can't you see that he ownership of the doll was even more indicative of an active paedophile than was the possession of the images?
a crime had to be committed to get those images so that is worse. the question is does the doll redirect the pedos energies, I'd say it probably does so banning "objects" that cant be used to harm others cant really be a crime but is just ill thought out and reactionary.
 


New Threads

Popular Threads

Most Replies

Top