One of the valid criticisms to lay on this Democrat Report is that it elevates and extrapolates individual extreme instances, that were outside policy and not approved to imply they were widespread and approved.
Case in point. One case.
Besides. Where exactly in the Democrat Report does it even establish such practice as either approved or common??? Quite the contrary:
DIRECTOR HAYDEN: "Many assertions [in the ICRC report] regarding physical or threatened abuse are egregious and are simply not true. On their face, they aren't even credible. Thi'eats of acts of sodomy, the aiTest and rape of family members, the intentional infection of HIV or any other diseases have never been and would never be authorized. There are no instances in which such threats or abuses took place."