The vote

riker1969

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 11, 2008
Messages
2,048
What's it looking like for the Greens? Yes or no to the programme for government??
 


Catapulta

Well-known member
Joined
May 12, 2020
Messages
371
Your in politics to get your hands on the levers of Power

- if that does not interest you

- find something else to do.....
 

jmcc

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 12, 2004
Messages
46,240
What's it looking like for the Greens? Yes or no to the programme for government??
Serious problems with the Gretas opposing it and the Hippies supporting it. Not sure if there's going to be a Fis Nua 2.0 split yet but there will have to be a lot of hard talking in the next few days.
 

Cailleach

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 13, 2009
Messages
1,214
What's it looking like for the Greens? Yes or no to the programme for government??
Yes - for bums on seats which will see the same cave-in this time as happened in '07 with Shannon, Tara and Shell; while Ryan is limp-lettucing on, that's as will be - and have no great hopes for what's coming after him either.
 

SuirView

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 29, 2012
Messages
14,790
Your in politics to get your hands on the levers of Power

- if that does not interest you

- find something else to do.....
The ex SF leader Adams was in charge for nearly 35 years.
He never went into talks regarding forming a government in the 26!
Some legacy.
 

galteeman

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 6, 2010
Messages
3,626
It's gas, the Greens want to end direct provision but that means the asylum seekers in that program will have to be housed somewhere else. I think that means they will come into direct conflict with our own indigenous scroungers for the free houses.
Many of those clowns already hate the poor foreigners and inflict terrible abuse on them and it's going to get worse.

The loony left of the Greens want to put free houses ahead of climate change. Do they not realise that building more and more houses just creates more and more damage to the environment and we should be trying to scale back on expanding everything all the time?
 

fifilawe

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 25, 2017
Messages
1,610
talk about a "Lame Duck Leader" in Éamo , he has a split tongue with each bit saying opposites things at the same time out both sides of his mouth.He is no Trevor Sargent , a man whom I thought was "straight with the media and the voters" .This current leader is a Lame Eunuch Drake and is very incoherent.He comes across as a man who is indecisive and would not "go into the trenches for any cause" , he would rather his underlings go to war.
 

Uganda

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 17, 2013
Messages
11,312
Fixed that for you.
no, you are wrong.

it is - even still - my guess.

My hope?

In some ways I hope the greens vote it down. Yes there will be political chaos for a while, but it will be nothing compared to the chaos when the likes of hourican do a Roisin shortfuse on it and flounce out because she isn’t happy with what she agreed.

there will then be either an election in which the greens will get absolutely hammered ( I believe only Eamon Ryan might hold his seat), or it will be a SFFF coalition with either the greens, soc dems, or labour as the meat in the sandwich.
 

Fullforward

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 8, 2010
Messages
9,575
no, you are wrong.

it is - even still - my guess.

My hope?

In some ways I hope the greens vote it down. Yes there will be political chaos for a while, but it will be nothing compared to the chaos when the likes of hourican do a Roisin shortfuse on it and flounce out because she isn’t happy with what she agreed.

there will then be either an election in which the greens will get absolutely hammered ( I believe only Eamon Ryan might hold his seat), or it will be a SFFF coalition with either the greens, soc dems, or labour as the meat in the sandwich.
What did she agree to that she is not agreeing to now?
 

riker1969

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 11, 2008
Messages
2,048
It's gas, the Greens want to end direct provision but that means the asylum seekers in that program will have to be housed somewhere else. I think that means they will come into direct conflict with our own indigenous scroungers for the free houses.
Many of those clowns already hate the poor foreigners and inflict terrible abuse on them and it's going to get worse.

The loony left of the Greens want to put free houses ahead of climate change. Do they not realise that building more and more houses just creates more and more damage to the environment and we should be trying to scale back on expanding everything all the time?
This text is nonsensical. We need more houses. What's your alternative? More tents?
 

riker1969

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 11, 2008
Messages
2,048
I think they will vote yes but not by enough and there in lies the rub
 


New Threads

Most Replies

Top Bottom