Seasonally adjusted Live Register decreases by 6,600 in
On a seasonally adjusted basis there was a monthly decrease of 6,600 in the Live Register in October 2010. This follows a decrease of 5,400 in September, and is the first time that the Live Register has fallen in two consecutive months since early 2007. The number of persons on the Live Register now stands at 429,553 which represents an annual increase of 17,146 (+4.2%) in the unadjusted series. This compares with an increase of 22,563 (+5.4%) in the year to September 2010.
Live register is actually down just short of 13,000, seasonally adjusted down 6,600.
I'm a reasonablt man tonic. My original thread title is in my post and readLive register is actually down just short of 13,000, seasonally adjusted down 6,600.
But watch those positive thread titles, Dave doesn't like'm you know.
Bollox Dave. This is the second month running that you've changed a mildly positive thread title on the live register figures for no reason at all so far as I can see, except maybe to suit some agenda you have yourself.It was a merged thread, I'd the text written for just after 11, you posted a thread title and a link to a pdf document. Your thread title may have been clear, posting a link to a pdf as the body of your post wasn't.
Okay, but you know there's a monthly race to post this hence the lack of detailIt was a merged thread, I'd the text written for just after 11, you posted a thread title and a link to a pdf document. Your thread title may have been clear, posting a link to a pdf as the body of your post wasn't.
Of the figures he could have used, down 11,000 odd, down 6,600 or down "slightly", he went for "slightly" and this after last month's similar effort. So no, "giving over" doesnt seem an attractive option to me.Tonic, give over. DC's title still referred to a decrease. He could have titled it, just as truthfully - "11,400 increase in Live Register" reflecting the year on year trend.
Once, no agenda, twice? Give me a break.No agenda here Tonic, and mind your language, I posted a thread, so did the OPer here, he'd a thread title with just a link, I'd posted a thread with the body of text, I merged both and used the title I used.
I've amended the title slightly now either way.
Please feel free to discuss the substantiative matter rather than killing the thread by having a go at me.
If Alonso *really* wants the thread title changed, that's fine, more than happy to accommodate his request, i'm not happy to accommodate an as-usual attack by you however.