It has come to our attention that some users may have been "banned" when they tried to change their passwords after the site was hacked due to a glitch in the old vBulletin software. This would have occurred around the end of February and does not apply after the site was converted to Xenforo. If you believe you were affected by this, please contact a staff member or use the Contact us link at the bottom of any forum page.
I just googled it and that popped up, hope it helps.
Do you think the party actually consulted any members about the policies coming up to the election :?hiker said:Wolverine said:http://www.labour.ie/policy/listing/11758603221460487.html
I just googled it and that popped up, hope it helps.
Yes this is a nice peice of work.
Whats the feedback from Labour members?
Do you know what the main objections were from the rural community?Rebelman said:this policy did not go down well with labours rural candidates or potential supporters, I challenged 3 labour candidates on it and all said they were personally opposed and they would oppose it if they were elected.
Has any policy ever, in the history of the world gone down well with rural folks?(apart from giving them sacks of free money)Rebelman said:this policy did not go down well with labours rural candidates or potential supporters, I challenged 3 labour candidates on it and all said they were personally opposed and they would oppose it if they were elected.
stewiegriffin said:Has any policy ever, in the history of the world gone down well with rural folks?(apart from giving them sacks of free money)Rebelman said:this policy did not go down well with labours rural candidates or potential supporters, I challenged 3 labour candidates on it and all said they were personally opposed and they would oppose it if they were elected.
Having just returned from a visit to the Scottish Highlands and having experienced their approach to it, I think theres a lot we could do here for promote the sector better. Id agree a compromise is required, will be interesting to see what the FF/GP government comes up with.Rebelman said:The farming lobby are the main objecters - obviously the public liability is a primary concern. But the other ones include - not obeying "the conutry code" e.g. leaving gates open, littering, damaging crops and ditches, disturbing animals, starting fires etc. all of which have a direct impact on the farmer.
I come from a rural area myself and although we were not farmers I worked on farms growing up and I am employed currently in agribusiness. I also am someone who enjoys walking and can see the tourism potential in it.
What is needed is COMPRIMISE with both sides sitting down and agreeing a code of practise for walkers and some agreed routes. Also something will have to be done to sort out the insurance issue. Those involved in country sports such as hunting, shooting, coursing and fishing have done this in the past with the farmers.
They've been 'sitting down' for years. The farmers wanted ongoing money to permit access. More money for doing nothing.What is needed is COMPRIMISE with both sides sitting down and agreeing a code of practise for walkers and some agreed routes.
Nationalise? That's not what Labour is proposing at all. Lands above 150m would be designated as 'public access lands'. Different kettle of fish.Auditor #9 said:I think the labour proposal was to nationalise(?) all private land above 150metres.
Killiney Hill is just over 150m (153). There are plenty of residences in and around Dun Laoghaire Rathdown / South Dublin that would be over the 150m threshold. It would be unfair on those residents to designate their properties 'public access lands'. I think something a little higher; say 250 to 300 meters would be more apt.ocean said:
This group was set up by a Mr Roger Garland. Familiar????Auditor #9 said:A crowd called Keep Ireland Open wants to establish a network of trails around rural Ireland
You suspect right. I have heard of a "per/meter rate" of payment from the Dept of Agriculture but I think this was rejected out of hand by the minister.hmmm said:I suspect the IFA smell money on this,
This stuff was debated on Prime Time last night and Albert Smith was very furious. Interesting to see foreigners as infuriated as us at our own people. Not surprising given that there was one bo11ox up in Mayo who had fenced off his own private beach! HANG HIM IMMEDIATELY!!hiker said:I think what landowners fear the most is the Scottish Solution; unlimited access to open hills legislated into law. This may reduced their ability to develop the land at some later date.
This is why the "rights-of-way" issue is causing such grief. 200 year old pathways can prevent the building of a new house or hotel etc etc.
Now I can understand this point of view.
If "rights-of-way" were replaced by a "right-to-access" then that might prevent particular pathways to the uplands being lgislated in stone, so to speak and allowing the hillwalkers to have a "right-to-access via any alternative route" available at the time.
Go to Germany and see what it's like there. You can walk from Austria in the south to Denmark in the north without crossing a road! There are dedicated roads for cyclists mainly but walkers can use em too. You pass cows and livestock on your way to Denmark and they are all fenced in by single electric wire fences. The paths thread through or across farmers properties which they themselves are obviously allowed to use and sometimes you have to avoid a tractor. Paths go nowhere near houses or at least not more near than a boreen here will go to a house. You pass between fields of corn and all - you could very easily just pick some crops and eat them on your way but you feel bad if you do.stonethrower said:Was at a meeting yesterday where the ICMSA fumed at the prospect of a law allowing for a right to roam. They said they would only accept some regulation where people would have to apply for permission to access lands.
Coming from a rural background I understand and sympathise with the concerns of farmers and landowners. I don't think the real issue here is money. I think farmers and rural dwellers have concerns about damage and the impact of people being given uncontrolled access to their property.
I know of cases where people have left gates open, have frightened animals, have created gaps in fences etc. Despite the fact that many urban dwellers have withdrawn behind their electronic gates and buzzers, they seem to think that farmers and rural dwellers should throw their gates open to all!!