Youtube in a mess again after it was pointed out that there are over 2m child exploitation videos on their site.

silverharp

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 21, 2015
Messages
16,310
Youtube in a mess again after it was pointed out that there are over 2m child exploitation videos on their site.

seems like Youtube dropped the ball by fault or design even though creators have been pointing the dark corners of the site hidden in plain view. Anyway some major advertisers twigged that their adverts were being shown on videos where kids were tied up etc and where the comment section was infested by pedos.
so far youtube has only gone as far as demonitising them or closing comments on others but still means the vast majority of the videos are still live.

must do better youtube, its not plausible that a billion dollar company with google behind it didnt know what was happening, maybe it liked the revenue stream?


https://news.vice.com/story/youtube-kills-ads-on-50000-channels-as-advertisers-flee-over-disturbing-child-content


Over the past week, YouTube says it has “terminated more than 270 accounts and removed over 150,000 videos from our platform in the last week.” The company also “turned off comments on over 625,000 videos targeted by child predators.

“Finally, over the past week we removed ads from nearly 2 million videos and over 50,000 channels masquerading as family-friendly content,” the Google-owned company said in a statement to VICE News. “Content that endangers children is abhorrent and unacceptable to us.”

Adidas, Mars, Hewlett-Packard, and a host of other big brands have all paused advertising on YouTube in the wake of reports revealing their ads were showing up alongside sexually explicit comments under videos of children. The tools used to screen such comments, volunteer moderators told the BBC, haven’t been working properly for over a year, allowing between 50,000 and 100,000 “predatory” accounts to remain on YouTube.
 


Watcher2

Well-known member
Joined
May 2, 2010
Messages
34,341
Is this not a case of shooting the messenger? I don't claim to understand the technology but wonder if the policing you talk about is even possible given the numbers of videos posted every day/minute/hour etc. But do the police follow up and try to hunt down the people making these videos? I don't think it's that complicated, is it? I mean, every computer has a unique identifier. What's the difficulty?
 

jackdonny9876

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 4, 2017
Messages
374
interesting how youtube has declared war on so called 'hate speech'(anything that doesn't fit their ideology) but make no mention of this
 

theObserver@hotmail.com

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 26, 2007
Messages
2,395
Is this not a case of shooting the messenger? I don't claim to understand the technology but wonder if the policing you talk about is even possible given the numbers of videos posted every day/minute/hour etc. But do the police follow up and try to hunt down the people making these videos? I don't think it's that complicated, is it? I mean, every computer has a unique identifier. What's the difficulty?
YouTube comments are famous for being toxic at the best of times.

The videos in question are generally not pornographic or illegal but they are creepy as ************************. Google enforces its censorship through AI bots which can crawl through thousands of videos per second and delete/demonetize (so adverts are not shown) videos dealing with certain topics.

Problem is a lot of people who earn a living from making youtube are getting caught in the AI sweep and are losing a lot of money. People who talk about mental health issues, suicide prevention, sexual health, reporting on disasters, use curse words etc are having their videos flagged and demonetized while the big channels are left untouched because the AI bots do not enforce the rules equally.

Ultimately youtube is an advertising platform. They want advertising friendly content Disney like 'lifestyle' videos where people are basically given free products to promote. They don't want anything risky that might scare away advertisers.
 

Sobieski

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 21, 2017
Messages
369
Begs the question why the almighty do no evil G, knowing exactly every detail of the posters histories cant do something useful and help the police stamp out perverted behavior and protect children.

Its not an advertising subject... why aren't they focusing on this as a primary concern?
 

silverharp

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 21, 2015
Messages
16,310
YouTube comments are famous for being toxic at the best of times.

The videos in question are generally not pornographic or illegal but they are creepy as ************************. Google enforces its censorship through AI bots which can crawl through thousands of videos per second and delete/demonetize (so adverts are not shown) videos dealing with certain topics.

Problem is a lot of people who earn a living from making youtube are getting caught in the AI sweep and are losing a lot of money. People who talk about mental health issues, suicide prevention, sexual health, reporting on disasters, use curse words etc are having their videos flagged and demonetized while the big channels are left untouched because the AI bots do not enforce the rules equally.

Ultimately youtube is an advertising platform. They want advertising friendly content Disney like 'lifestyle' videos where people are basically given free products to promote. They don't want anything risky that might scare away advertisers.
I know some well known creators had to start campaigns to get channels taken down, some of these channels were getting millions of views so they must have been on Youtube's radar as they were bringing in some major bucks. They havnt treated their decent creators very well. I think they want to become a TV station which is exactly the opposite of what its users and creators want. Also the legacy media will do all they can to purge Youtube on independent content because its compeition
 

Dame_Enda

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 14, 2011
Messages
53,666
There isnt child abuse in the videos from what Ive heard in the news. The problem is that paedophiles are reportedly making sexual comments about normal videos of children.
 

The_SR

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 11, 2009
Messages
18,040
interesting how youtube has declared war on so called 'hate speech'(anything that doesn't fit their ideology) but make no mention of this
What?

YouTube can ban or chose not to hosts whatever they want. Its a private site. They are under no obligation to host anything
 

Civic_critic2

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 29, 2008
Messages
4,883
This is a move to normalise censorship, we are seeing it all across social media with Facebook and Google targeting political sites and doing so in full collaboration with governments and intelligence agencies. The populations of the west are the target of these, using the best cover excuses they can muster, as part of austerity and the drive to war.

These corporate fascists shouldn't be in charge of centralised control of this technology in the first place.
 

The_SR

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 11, 2009
Messages
18,040
This is a move to normalise censorship, we are seeing it all across social media with Facebook and Google targeting political sites and doing so in full collaboration with governments and intelligence agencies. The populations of the west are the target of these, using the best cover excuses they can muster, as part of austerity and the drive to war.

These corporate fascists shouldn't be in charge of centralised control of this technology in the first place.
Bullsh1t. They are private entities who are perfectly entitled to enforce pre agreed rules and standards.

The notion of paedophiles having a right to organise around innocent vidoes of children is contemptible.
 

Dame_Enda

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 14, 2011
Messages
53,666
Bullsh1t. They are private entities who are perfectly entitled to enforce pre agreed rules and standards.

The notion of paedophiles having a right to organise around innocent vidoes of children is contemptible.
It may be contemptible. But if parents were not uploading these videos there wouldnt be an issue with youtube.

I am concerned that we are getting to a stage where the family photo - a normal staple of 2 centuries of childhood - will become a thing of the past because of a fear of the internal thought processes of a tiny minority of unwell individuals. The State is not capable of controlling peoples thought patterns. What should happen is that youtube should police its comments pages and also, parents should keep their children from using the internet.
 

Civic_critic2

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 29, 2008
Messages
4,883
We have complete corporate control. The personal communications of 2 billion people are controlled by the idiot Zuckerberg. Google have eliminated many left-wing websites from their results since April of last year when they instituted their new (political control) algorithm. Google are in bed with the US intelligence agencies and Facebook are consulting with governments to institute their policies on 'hate speech'. They're even using algorithms to datamine people's posts for indications of suicide and calling the cops on them 'getting them the help they need'.

The pattern is obvious, is coming all at the same time and all across the different platforms. We are in the lead-up to war and these psychos want nothing to interfere with their brainwashing.
 


New Threads

Top